South Korea plans to set out a non-binding framework with the United States to spell out how to run and structure the $350 billion in investment pledged under a July trade agreement, a senior official said on Monday. Seoul and Washington in July struck a trade accord that lowers United States tariffs in return for […]South Korea plans to set out a non-binding framework with the United States to spell out how to run and structure the $350 billion in investment pledged under a July trade agreement, a senior official said on Monday. Seoul and Washington in July struck a trade accord that lowers United States tariffs in return for […]

South Korea open to $350 billion investment in non-binding US deal

2025/08/26 22:46
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

South Korea plans to set out a non-binding framework with the United States to spell out how to run and structure the $350 billion in investment pledged under a July trade agreement, a senior official said on Monday.

Seoul and Washington in July struck a trade accord that lowers United States tariffs in return for South Korea pledging investments, but both sides have differed on parts of the deal, such as the distribution of profits.

Kim Yong-beom, presidential policy adviser, stated that the governments are close to a broad understanding. Kim said the United States wants to conclude an MOU soon to set the structure and oversight for the investment strategy. 

The financial package would back strategic industries, he said, citing key minerals, batteries, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, pharmaceuticals, and quantum computing. He also repeated that up to $150 billion is allocated for shipbuilding.

South Korea pushes back on U.S. profit-sharing demands

Seoul plans to launch a task force to draft detailed implementation steps, headed by the finance ministry funded by state banks, Kim said. Korean officials have pushed back on Lutnick’s earlier suggestion that the United States would take 90% of profits. They also say equity stakes would be small, with loans and guarantees making up most of the funding.

Trump said in July that South Korea would finance projects “owned and controlled by the United States” and selected by him. Seoul officials say a safety structure will curb financing risk, including United States pledges to purchase project output and to invest only in commercially viable ventures.

South Korea’s new president, Lee Jae Myung, has faced a test during his meeting with Trump for their first summit, as the allies try to manage geopolitics.

South Korea’s economy depends on the United States, which provides military forces and nuclear deterrence. Lee aims to keep cooperation with Washington while avoiding a rift with China, South Korea’s biggest trading partner. As he left for the United States, Lee sent a delegation to Beijing with a message to normalize ties after years of strain.

South Korea seeks stability in talks with Trump

Trump has criticized South Korea, describing it as a “money machine” that profits from U.S. military protection. Analysts say South Korea’s Lee wants to try to make a positive impression, build a connection with Trump and avoid surprises.

Under pressure from the Trump administration, South Korean negotiators reached a last-minute agreement last month that averted the toughest of the new United States tariffs. 

“There are many major topics in the security field,” Kim Yong-beom, Lee’s top policy aide, announced last week. “Our position is that trade was already finalized last time. We hope that specific implementation plans for trade won’t be included in the summit at all, or at least should be kept simple if discussed.”

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Polytrade Logo
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0.04032
$0.04032$0.04032
-2.34%
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
When the Middle East burns, the Filipino nanay feels the heat

When the Middle East burns, the Filipino nanay feels the heat

(Part 1 of 2) On Feb. 28, the world watched as the US-Israel coalition launched coordinated airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, which also
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/16 00:03
The Hidden Costs of a Smart Home: How to Calculate Your Real Electricity Usage

The Hidden Costs of a Smart Home: How to Calculate Your Real Electricity Usage

You just finished setting up your smart home. The lights respond to your voice. The thermostat adjusts itself. The security cameras check in every few minutes.
Share
Techbullion2026/03/16 02:35