As classroom sizes expand, instructors increasingly rely on multiscale design analytics to streamline assessment, enhance feedback, and support students’ self-reflection—while emphasizing that analytics should guide, not dictate, how students organize and develop their design work.As classroom sizes expand, instructors increasingly rely on multiscale design analytics to streamline assessment, enhance feedback, and support students’ self-reflection—while emphasizing that analytics should guide, not dictate, how students organize and develop their design work.

Educators Embrace Multiscale Analytics to Help Students Understand Their Design Processes Better

2025/12/09 18:00

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Prior Work and 2.1 Educational Objectives of Learning Activities

    2.2 Multiscale Design

    2.3 Assessing Creative Visual Design

    2.4 Learning Analytics and Dashboards

  2. Research Artifact/Probe

    3.1 Multiscale Design Environment

    3.2 Integrating a Design Analytics Dashboard with the Multiscale Design Environment

  3. Methodology and Context

    4.1 Course Contexts

    4.2 Instructor interviews

  4. Findings

    5.1 Gaining Insights and Informing Pedagogical Action

    5.2 Support for Exploration, Understanding, and Validation of Analytics

    5.3 Using Analytics for Assessment and Feedback

    5.4 Analytics as a Potential Source of Self-Reflection for Students

  5. Discussion + Implications: Contextualizing: Analytics to Support Design Education

    6.1 Indexicality: Demonstrating Design Analytics by Linking to Instances

    6.2 Supporting Assessment and Feedback in Design Courses through Multiscale Design Analytics

    6.3 Limitations of Multiscale Design Analytics

  6. Conclusion and References

A. Interview Questions

\

5.3 Using Analytics for Assessment and Feedback

The more design classroom sizes continue to grow, the more that instructors are challenged in having time to provide optimal levels of feedback to each student [47]. Prior studies have found analytics useful toward scaling assessment and feedback [49, 60]. Our findings for multiscale design analytics align. I1 and I4 expressed that the analytics can become a part of their rubrics and feedback they give to students. Further, according to I4, making these analytics a part of rubrics can motivate and provide students guidance on what instructors are looking for in their design.

\ I1: I think [these analytics and my rubrics] complement each other. I think it will be very helpful…if there’s a way that I can just sort of make a rubric on [dashboard] and attach to when they get their feedback.

\ I4: You know, give them something to shoot for…I think that I would say…here are the things that I’d like to see in your design…I think that I would definitely like to assign scales as a part of the rubric to say, I would like to see the big picture from out here, and then when you zoom in, see more.

\ We observe the potential of multiscale design analytics toward expediting instructors’ assessment work. I9 preferred to utilize analytics as a quick-to-use indicator of underlying problems. The analytics help them reduce the time they otherwise would spend on assessing each design.

\ I9: So, I won’t use the values in the column to directly give them points…But it’s better than having to go to every [design] and look for every single issue or having a much larger rubric that I ran by…So think of the analytics as the symptoms and [then] you actually identify diseases.

5.4 Analytics as a Potential Source of Self-Reflection for Students

Instructors (I1, I4, I5, I6) in our study expressed expectations that students would benefit from seeing multiscale design analytics. According to them, seeing analytics has the potential to help students reflect on their progress. More specifically, seeing analytics can help students in becoming aware of how they are organizing their ideas spatially across scales and clusters. Self-reflection through analytics plays a vital role in learning, as it helps students in understanding their progress and stimulates improvements in their work [77, 81].

\ I5: I’m all for giving students as much information as they can use…and you know…they can use [analytics] to look at their progress.

\ I1: Yeah, I would love students to explore more zoom levels…because usually, I think it is more like…I see it as an overall picture…but they don’t really utilize being able to kind of go in to certain areas or zooming in to certain parts and elaborating…[Also,] maybe spatial clusters just so that they could be more aware about how they separate.

\ While both I1 and I4 advocate for providing students with multiscale design analytics, they also caution against enforcing a specific type of visual organization. According to them, the goal of providing analytics would be to help students to reflect and effectively use multiscale organization, not to have a specific number of scales or clusters across scales.

\ I4: I wouldn’t want them all to look the same like you don’t want to go somewhere and see every painting looks the same, but it was almost as if some people were painting with boards and nails and hammers versus paintbrushes and paint. They just didn’t really get what they’re supposed to be putting on the [multiscale design]. So then it was just like not as effective.

\ I1: [While] they have to become a little bit more mindful of [space]…just seeing how they lay out everything themselves…I would rather not control whether intentionally or unintentionally at all how they see spatial clusters.

\ \

:::info Authors:

(1) Ajit Jain, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Audigent;

(2) Andruid Kerne, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: University of Illinois Chicago;

(3) Nic Lupfer, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Mapware;

(4) Gabriel Britain, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Microsoft;

(5) Aaron Perrine, Texas A&M University, USA;

(6) Yoonsuck Choe, Texas A&M University, USA;

(7) John Keyser, Texas A&M University, USA;

(8) Ruihong Huang, Texas A&M University, USA;

(9) Jinsil Seo, Texas A&M University, USA;

(10) Annie Sungkajun, Illinois State University, USA;

(11) Robert Lightfoot, Texas A&M University, USA;

(12) Timothy McGuire, Texas A&M University, USA.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

:::

\

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14