The post CFTC Pulls 2020 Actual Delivery Crypto Guidance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The CFTC pulled its 2020 staff guidance on “actual delivery,” a keyThe post CFTC Pulls 2020 Actual Delivery Crypto Guidance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The CFTC pulled its 2020 staff guidance on “actual delivery,” a key

CFTC Pulls 2020 Actual Delivery Crypto Guidance

2025/12/12 18:10

The CFTC pulled its 2020 staff guidance on “actual delivery,” a key test that can decide whether some retail crypto trades fall under futures-style rules.

CFTC withdraws “actual delivery” crypto guidance it issued in 2020

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has withdrawn staff guidance that explained how the agency interpreted “actual delivery” for retail commodity transactions involving “virtual currencies,” a standard that can determine whether a crypto trade falls under futures-style regulation.

Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham said on Dec. 11, 2025, that the agency pulled the guidance because crypto markets have changed since it was released and because the prior framework had become outdated and overly complex.

The announcement points to broader CFTC work tied to federal digital-asset policy recommendations, and it says the agency may later consider updated guidance or FAQs while inviting public engagement through its Crypto Sprint.

Why “actual delivery” still drives how some retail crypto trades get regulated

The “actual delivery” concept matters because US law treats certain margined, leveraged, or financed retail commodity transactions “as if” they were futures contracts unless they qualify for the actual-delivery exception. That exception can keep a transaction out of futures-style rules when delivery occurs within the required time window.

In March 2020, the CFTC issued final interpretive guidance focused on retail commodity transactions in virtual currency, describing two main factors it considered when deciding whether actual delivery occurred. Those factors centered on whether the customer obtained possession and control of the full amount purchased and whether the seller and any counterparties kept residual interests or control that undercut delivery.

The CFTC’s Dec. 11 withdrawal removes that specific 2020 staff guidance from the agency’s active playbook, but it does not erase the underlying statutory framework that makes “actual delivery” a key dividing line for certain retail crypto products.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13071/cftc-scraps-actual-delivery-crypto-playbook-from-2020

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

5 key takeaways from CNBC investigation

5 key takeaways from CNBC investigation

The post 5 key takeaways from CNBC investigation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Walmart‘s online marketplace has become a key part of its strategy to grow profit faster than sales and better compete against its longtime rival, Amazon. As the largest U.S. retailer with more than 4,600 locations nationwide, growing sales online is also critical for its future. But a CNBC investigation found Walmart’s digital boom came as it made it easier for third-party sellers to join and sell on its marketplace, a strategy that has come with a cost. Some consumers have received counterfeit, potentially dangerous products after shopping on the marketplace, CNBC found. The investigation also uncovered dozens of third-party sellers who had stolen the credentials of another business to set up an account, including some who were offering fake health and beauty items. In the early days of Walmart’s online marketplace, former employees and sellers said it had strict policies for vetting third-party sellers and the products they offer. But over time, Walmart loosened those controls in a bid to woo sellers away from Amazon and appear more friendly than its rival, according to sellers, e-commerce consultants, and current and former employees.  When asked for comment on CNBC’s reporting, Walmart said “trust and safety are non-negotiable for us.”  “Counterfeiters are bad actors who target retail marketplaces across the world, and we are aggressive in our efforts to prevent and combat their deceptive behavior,” Walmart said. “We enforce a zero-tolerance policy for prohibited or noncompliant products and continue to invest in new tools and technologies to help ensure only trusted, legitimate items reach our customers.”  CNBC’s investigation uncovered new details about Walmart’s strategy to grow its online marketplace and the risks it took to take market share from Amazon.  Here are five takeaways from the investigation. Stolen identities and product tests  During CNBC’s investigation into Walmart’s marketplace, it found at least 43…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 22:10