In this interview, Wingbits CEO Robin Wingårdh explains how Korean Air uses blockchain-verified ADS-B data for aviation R&D, AAM, and future flight systems.In this interview, Wingbits CEO Robin Wingårdh explains how Korean Air uses blockchain-verified ADS-B data for aviation R&D, AAM, and future flight systems.

Korean Air x Wingbits Interview: Blockchain-Powered Aviation Data with Robin Wingårdh

7 min read
Wingbits525

To be attributed to Robin Wingårdh, CEO and Co-Founder of Wingbits

Q1. Korean Air’s R&D Center is now using Wingbits’ blockchain-verified ADS-B feed to support its ACROSS program. Concretely, how is your data being ingested and used in ACROSS development and testing, and what problem(s) does it solve that legacy feeds don’t?

Wingbits provides a data feed to the Korean Air R&D Department that contains aggregated telemetry data. This allows them to monitor and analyze the current airspace across multiple parameters for their research in the area of AAM. We cannot speak to how legacy networks ingest and process the data, but to our knowledge, we are the only network whose data has proof of location and proof of source.

Q2. Wingbits positions itself as a DePIN for aviation surveillance. What specific attributes of the DePIN model (token incentives, decentralization, edge receivers, on-chain proofs) make it especially well-suited for safety-critical aviation use cases like AAM?

For many years and until today, the collection and aggregation of data have mostly relied on individual volunteers setting up their own stations. The data that the station collects is sent to the network to perform some processing, which is then made available for purchase in various forms either as a data stream or fed into an application. The volunteers are given access to a subscription program that the network offers, which serves as the reward for the data they collect from their stations, which are sold to the networks. There is value in this business model given the profitability that most of these commercial networks exhibit.

Wingbits values the community of station hosts for their cooperation, time and effort in sending the data. They deserve to be rewarded with items that are much more valuable than a subscription. This has created an incentive model that produces much more efficient data density per station than other networks. For example, we have observed that throughout multiple peak times, Wingbits is tracking anywhere from 70 to 80% of the aircraft that other networks, whose advertised active stations are 10 to 12 times greater.

Q3. When airline R&D teams and air navigation service providers need “aviation-grade” reliability and auditability, how do you demonstrate that your blockchain verification and encryption meet those standards? Any certifications, SLA metrics, or audit processes you can describe?

Regulators, such as the FAA, have performance requirements for ADS-B systems needed for air traffic management, though there are no specific certifications needed for ADS-B stations used in situational awareness and non-safety related use cases. At Wingbits, we therefore let the data demonstrate our quality. 

We have added some significant improvements that our competitors are unable to provide: proof of source of data (we know, at a hardware level, the exact station the data is originating from) and proof of location (we know where the station is located).

Q4. Tokenized participation is core to your architecture. How do you design incentive mechanisms so contributor rewards don’t compromise data quality or create perverse incentives (e.g., false reports, duplicate claims)?

The tokenization aligns directly with our business goals. We created a performance model that rewards users who have a set-up that runs constantly, covering as much area as possible, as close as possible to major airports. We workshopped the rewards engine in such a way that it reduces the incentives to cheat. For example, it doesn’t matter if you send duplicates of the same data points because only unique data points will count towards your rewards. 

We also run continuous data quality checks on the data itself, and if we ever identify a strange case, we can ban the station from the network. This creates a network that is able to reward people at scale while still keeping the latency low and the quality high.

Q5. ADS-B data is sensitive and can be abused if misused. What privacy, access-control and anti-spoofing measures are implemented at the receiver, network and blockchain layers to keep surveillance data secure and compliant with aviation/regulatory requirements?

This might sound counterintuitive, but the ADS-B data is not private. It is broadcast on public radio, and anyone can listen to it. We only collect it, and therefore, there are very few regulatory requirements that we need to follow.

The data can be used for multiple use cases, some more strict than others. On the network level, we have really high station GPS accuracy, and we only accept traffic from stations that were onboarded in-factory.

Q6. Wingbits recently expanded via a satellite launch and fundraising. How do satellite feeds and space-based receivers change the coverage, latency and redundancy picture compared with terrestrial crowd-sourced receivers for global AAM operations?

The satellite feed allows us to validate the data we’re collecting from the terrestrial network. Think of it as a constant check as the satellite covers the area it traverses. 

Q7. Integration with legacy ATM, FAA/EASA/ICAO processes and local regulators is often the hardest part. How are you approaching regulatory acceptance and data-sharing agreements, and what roadblocks have you encountered so far with airline or government partners?

This will always be the case, especially for a heavily regulated industry.  Fortunately, there are use cases that fall outside regulatory realms.  We hope that by partnering with organizations that already have ties to the regulatory bodies, as well as research-oriented parties like Korean Air and universities, it will make navigating roadblocks less of a concern. Ultimately, we want to be the best at collecting and delivering data to the end users, not navigating the regulatory landscape. 

Q8. Korean Air’s use represents a move from proof-of-concept to operational testing. What engineering and governance lessons did Wingbits learn from early pilots that you changed or hardened to meet airline R&D needs?

We learnt a lot from Korean Air’s testing of our data quality for fidelity and latency. 

Q9. For cities and operators planning eVTOL corridors, what is the role of decentralized flight-intelligence providers like Wingbits versus centralized surveillance incumbents? Do you see these systems as complementary, and if so, how do you federate trust across them?

It will likely be the end users and those ingesting the data that will determine how best to utilize both systems. Those ingesting data should be able to ingest from both types of networks, merging, processing and performing their analysis. Both systems are complementary, serving as validation for each other. 

Q10. As AAM traffic density grows (dense urban corridors), how does Wingbits plan to scale data ingestion, on-chain verification and query performance while keeping latency low for real-time routing decisions?

We have a very talented engineering team ensuring the backbone of the infrastructure is set up to scale the processes.  They have done a wonderful job of scaling it from a few hundred stations to nearly 5,000 at the moment. We are confident that they are up to any challenges that may pop up in this area. 

Q11. From a commercial standpoint, what business models are you exploring with enterprise partners (data subscriptions, licensing, tokenized marketplaces, revenue-share with contributors), and how do you balance commercialization with openness needed for safety and interoperability?

That’s the beauty of a startup that is being led by founders. In our early stages, we are not bound by trying to implement a SaaS model that caters to Wall Street’s desires. We are open to speaking to any party that has a relevant interest in partnering with us in any capacity: as a data subscriber, licensed distributor, or as a strategic or marketing partner.  

Q12. Looking five years out, what are the most exciting global projects or partnerships you hope to enable with the Wingbits DePIN, and what would success look like for both the aviation industry and the contributor community?

Five years seem so far away, given what our team has accomplished in the past two. The beauty of data and aviation is that new use cases continue to emerge as more mainstream research and new types of aircraft occupy the airspace. We believe that Wingbits will be a trailblazer in the way the community is taken care of and incentivized.  As the well-respected Charlie Munger stated, “Show me the incentive, and I will show you the outcome”. We think the rapid network growth exemplifies this. We aim to be the backbone of aviation positional data, powering applications but also proactively and creatively working with industry players to develop applications that can better serve their rapidly changing operational needs.  

Market Opportunity
B Logo
B Price(B)
$0.19012
$0.19012$0.19012
+11.18%
USD
B (B) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Today we compare Pepeto (PEPETO), BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe (and how they stack up today) by the main […] The post Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:39
Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

BitcoinWorld Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal In a dramatic shift for one of cryptocurrency’s leading networks, Solana (
Share
bitcoinworld2026/02/05 06:45