The post These 10 Imports Are Being Hit Hardest appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. French wines like these and other imported wines are subject to tariffs 90.77% of the time. (Photo by: Deb Cohn-Orbach/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images If you bought a nice, imported bottle of wine recently, there’s a better than 90% chance it entered the United States only after paying a tariff, probably about 15%. That six-pack of imported beer in the next aisle? Only 7.32% of beer imports have been subjected to a tariff, according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau data, meaning there’s a good chance it entered tariff-free. So, a toast – no, no, somehow that doesn’t feel right. This is a look at 10 specific import categories and the impact of President Trump’s tariff wars. The first five have the highest probability of a tariff being required before entering the United States. That includes not only wine but imports of women’s dresses, jewelry with precious metals and several types of shoes. The second five include cars, oil, motor vehicle parts, refined petroleum and medical equipment. Tariff payments on these imports are the largest. While this is little pushback on the first five, there is some here, from the automotive industry and the energy companies. Before we get to the specific categories, I should mention that Iam not going to address one non-specific import category, the only one that appears on both lists. It’s what the U.S. Census Bureau calls “low-value” shipments and was once largely the province of FedEx, UPS and other courier shipments valued at less than $800. Today, these shipments are often online purchases, shipped to our doorsteps, the contents of their packaging often inscribed with Made In China. Because of their low value, little information was gathered or released about them. Former President Joe Biden was looking to… The post These 10 Imports Are Being Hit Hardest appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. French wines like these and other imported wines are subject to tariffs 90.77% of the time. (Photo by: Deb Cohn-Orbach/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images If you bought a nice, imported bottle of wine recently, there’s a better than 90% chance it entered the United States only after paying a tariff, probably about 15%. That six-pack of imported beer in the next aisle? Only 7.32% of beer imports have been subjected to a tariff, according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau data, meaning there’s a good chance it entered tariff-free. So, a toast – no, no, somehow that doesn’t feel right. This is a look at 10 specific import categories and the impact of President Trump’s tariff wars. The first five have the highest probability of a tariff being required before entering the United States. That includes not only wine but imports of women’s dresses, jewelry with precious metals and several types of shoes. The second five include cars, oil, motor vehicle parts, refined petroleum and medical equipment. Tariff payments on these imports are the largest. While this is little pushback on the first five, there is some here, from the automotive industry and the energy companies. Before we get to the specific categories, I should mention that Iam not going to address one non-specific import category, the only one that appears on both lists. It’s what the U.S. Census Bureau calls “low-value” shipments and was once largely the province of FedEx, UPS and other courier shipments valued at less than $800. Today, these shipments are often online purchases, shipped to our doorsteps, the contents of their packaging often inscribed with Made In China. Because of their low value, little information was gathered or released about them. Former President Joe Biden was looking to…

These 10 Imports Are Being Hit Hardest

French wines like these and other imported wines are subject to tariffs 90.77% of the time. (Photo by: Deb Cohn-Orbach/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

If you bought a nice, imported bottle of wine recently, there’s a better than 90% chance it entered the United States only after paying a tariff, probably about 15%.

That six-pack of imported beer in the next aisle?

Only 7.32% of beer imports have been subjected to a tariff, according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau data, meaning there’s a good chance it entered tariff-free.

So, a toast – no, no, somehow that doesn’t feel right.

This is a look at 10 specific import categories and the impact of President Trump’s tariff wars. The first five have the highest probability of a tariff being required before entering the United States. That includes not only wine but imports of women’s dresses, jewelry with precious metals and several types of shoes.

The second five include cars, oil, motor vehicle parts, refined petroleum and medical equipment. Tariff payments on these imports are the largest. While this is little pushback on the first five, there is some here, from the automotive industry and the energy companies.

Before we get to the specific categories, I should mention that Iam not going to address one non-specific import category, the only one that appears on both lists. It’s what the U.S. Census Bureau calls “low-value” shipments and was once largely the province of FedEx, UPS and other courier shipments valued at less than $800.

Today, these shipments are often online purchases, shipped to our doorsteps, the contents of their packaging often inscribed with Made In China. Because of their low value, little information was gathered or released about them. Former President Joe Biden was looking to reign in the so-called de minimis exclusion, in large part due to concerns about fentanyl and its precursors being shipped into the United States, and President Trump has now eliminated it.

One final note about the specific imports. I limited this analysis to the top 100 import categories from among more than 1,200. These 100 have accounted for three-fourths of total U.S. imports this year.

And one final note about tariffs and their impact, about which I have written previously. The total tariff value paid through July was 9.47% of all U.S. imports, according to my analysis. That’s the second-highest total going back decades, second only to the 10.03% rate in June. In March, one month before President Trump kicked off the trade war with the world, the rate was 2.38%.

A lingering question on the minds of many is, “Where is the inflation that was supposed to accompany tariffs?”

There are a number of factors in this, of course. But just one is that many tariffs that Trump has threatened are not yet being paid for one reason or another – and might never be, depending on the outcome of negotiations with countries, changes of heart and Supreme Court decisions.

Among those tariffs threatened but not yet being collected are those on the top three U.S. import trade partners, Mexico, Canada and China, which alone account for 35.66% of the total this year.

Let’s get back to the wine (HS 2004) and the rest of the lists.

European wines and many others subject to tariffs are responsible for 90.77 of all wine imports being hit with a tariff this year.

ustradenumbers.com

Wine tariffs

The reason the likelihood of your bottle of imported wine having been hit with a tariff is so high is because more than 80% of all U.S. wine imports come from France, Italy and a host of other European countries. The European Union, as you might recall, was among the first to agree to a baseline tariff of 15% with the United States.

Conversely, beer is so low because more than 87% of all beer (HS 2203) that entered the United States in July, the most recent government data available, came from one country: Mexico.

Why does that matter? Even though Trump has threatened 25% tariffs on Mexico, he quickly exempted anything that qualified for entry under the USMCA free trade agreement he negotiated in his first term – perhaps realizing the havoc that would be created if he didn’t announce the sweeping exemption. Mexico is the top source of U.S. imports, so a baseline tariff of 25% would have thrown a crippling punch at the U.S. economy.

For the same reason, the likelihood of your bottle of Mexican tequila being hit with a tariff is a fraction of the likelihood of that bottle of single malt whiskey from Scotland. The United Kingdom also agreed early on to a baseline tariff, in this case 10%.

Now for a few categories that might not make women too happy (or the men in their lives).

China and other Asian manufacturers have all agreed to increased tariffs or were already paying them. With 87.38 percent of all women’s dresses being hit with tariffs, it’s hard to imagine there won’t be price increases at the retail level.

ustradenumbers.com

Women’s dress tariffs

Dresses and women’s suits (HS 6204) stand a better than 87% chance of being hit with a tariff before entering the United States. Similarly, it’s where these imports originate that matters.

Vietnam and China are accounting for 36.91% of the total, with the former agreeing to a 20% U.S. import tariff and the later still subject to a 30% tariff. Bangladesh agreed to 20%, India is at 25% without an agreement, Indonesia and Cambodia both agree to 19%. A number of the tariff rates can be found at the Atlantic Council website.

India has yet to agree to a baseline tariff with the United States and, at this point, is subject to a 25% tariff.

ustradenumbers.com

Jewelry tariffs

Then there’s jewelry that includes precious metals (HS 7113), which almost certainly skews female but would include men’s jewelry as well. This would include rings, necklaces, bracelets, cuff links, earrings and the like. Through July, 72.72% percent of U.S. imports were subjected to a tariff.

The countries that are supplying these imports into the United Staes include four countries with about two-thirds of the total: India, which has a tariff rate of 25%; Italy and France, which combine for more than 35% of the total and are tariffed at 15%; and Thailand at 19%.

Vietnam has come to dominate U.S. shoe imports in recent years, including with leather shoes.

ustradenumbers.com

Women’s and men’s shoe tariffs

And what’s a nice new dress, a shiny necklace and earrings without a nice new pair of shoes? Shoes – for men and women, girls and boys – face a high likelihood of being hit with a tariff regardless of whether they are, for example, leather dress shoes (HS 6403, 84.24% likelihood), rubber athletic shoes (HS 6402, 89.23%), or running shoes with fabric “uppers” (HS 6404, 83.34%). These will involve imports from a number of countries but China and Vietnam are the two prime players. (I realize I “overstepped” and went with six imports but I wanted to include all three of these footwear categories.)

Let’s look at the five where the value of the tariffs collected is the greatest.

The “carve out” for USMCA partners for Mexico and Canada really shows up in passenger vechile imports, keeping the percentage of imports hit with tariffs relatively low.

ustradenumbers.com

Passenger vehicle tariffs

First up is passenger vehicles (HS 8703). While the percentage that is being taxed is relatively small compared to those of the first list of five, the 52.37% subject to tariffs is equal to $57.93 billion through June. The percentage is low because of the 37.62% from Mexico and Canada, all are exempt from tariffs, if they are USMCA compliant. (This depends on, for example, the percentage of the parts that originate in one of the three USMCA countries.)

But certainly, passenger vehicles from Japan, South Korea and Germany and other nations are being hit with tariffs. It’s an attempt to boost the fortunes of U.S. automakers and their workers. But separate tariffs on U.S. imports of steel and aluminum – important content in U.S.-manufactured vehicles, makes that a challenge. In addition, numerous foreign automakers operate in Mexico and Canada while essentially all the major foreign automakers manufacture in the United States, largely in the South.

Oil tariffs

Tariffs on oil (HS 2709) are hitting an even smaller 33.20% of all oil imports. But the total is $28.11 billion. It’s a particularly low percentage because Canada is accounting for more than 60% of all imports of foreign oil this year – and exempted from the proposed 35% tariff – while Mexico accounts for another 6.44% – and is also exempted.

Mexico and Canada, along with the United States are part of the world’s most sophisticated supply chain — that of the automotive industry. Because of USMCA compliance, many of these parts have not been required to pay a tariff through July.

ustradenumbers.com

Motor vehicle part tariffs

Tariffs in the major category of motor vehicle parts (8708) are totaling $25.55 billion through July, with 52.67% of all imports subjected to tariffs. With 55.68% coming from Mexico and Canada and presumably largely being exempt under USMCA compliance, the $25.55 billion will largely be coming from China, Japan and South Korea.

Refined petroleum tariffs

The value of refined petroleum (HS 2710), which includes gasoline as well as other fuels, subjected to tariffs before entry into the United States $15.48 billion. That is equal to 55.51% of the total, with imports from Canada and Mexico keeping the percentage in check.

Medical equipment tariffs

Finally, tariffs on medical equipment (HS 9018) are totaling $26.52 billion so far this year. The percentage of imports subject to a tariff payment is 31.09%. This category runs the gamut from syringes and catheters to MRI and EKG machinery.

In conclusion

Navigating the world of tariffs since President Trump’s April 2 “Liberation Day,” when he first laid out specifics for his trade war with the world, is complicated by a host of factors. Some tariffs are announced but not implemented. Some tariffs are paused. Some are increased and some are decreased. But there’s little doubt that the overall tariff rate has quadrupled this year and that the percentage of specific imports subjected to tariffs is quite often dependent on the originating country.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenroberts/2025/10/07/navigating-trumps-tariffs-these-10-imports-are-being-hit-hardest/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 13, 2026

Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 13, 2026

The crypto market is trading slightly higher today, with total cryptocurrency market capitalization rising by around 1.7% over the past 24 hours to approximately
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/13 22:26
After the interest rate cut, how far can the institutional bull market go?

After the interest rate cut, how far can the institutional bull market go?

The dominant force in this cycle comes from institutions. The four major cryptocurrencies, BTC, ETH, SOL, and BNB, have all hit new highs, but only BTC and BNB have continued to rise by over 40% since breaking through their all-time highs. SOL achieved a breakout earlier this year thanks to Trump's coin launch, while ETH experienced a revaluation mid-year driven by DAT buying, but neither has yet reached a new high. The Federal Reserve cut interest rates last night. How far can this round of institutional-led market trends go? 1. The institutional configuration logic of the three major currencies The positioning of crypto assets directly determines their long-term value, and different positioning corresponds to different institutional configuration logic. Bitcoin: The anti-inflation property of digital gold Positioned as "digital gold," its long-term logic is strongly tied to the fiat currency inflation cycle. Data shows that its market capitalization growth is synchronized with Global M2 and negatively correlated with the US dollar index. Its core value lies in its "inflation resistance" and value preservation and appreciation, making it a fundamental target for institutional investment. Ethereum: The Institutional Narrative Dividend of the World Computer Positioned as the "World Computer," although the foundation's "Layer 2 scaling" narrative has failed to gain traction in the capital market, its stable system, with 10 years of zero downtime, has capitalized on the development of institutional narratives such as US dollar stablecoins, RWAs, and the tokenization of US stocks. It has shrugged off the collapse of the Web3 narrative, and with the crucial push from DAT, has achieved a revaluation of its market capitalization. Ethereum, with its stability and security, will become the settlement network for institutional applications. Solana: The Active Advantage of Online Capital Markets Positioned as an "Internet Capital Market," Solana (ICM) stands for on-chain asset issuance, trading, and clearing. It has experienced a resurgence following the collapse of FTX. Year-to-date, it accounts for 46% of on-chain trading volume, with over 3 million daily active users year-round, making it the most active blockchain network. Solana, with its superior performance and high liquidity, will be the catalyst for the crypto-native on-chain trading ecosystem. The three platforms have distinct positioning, leading to different institutional investment logic. Traditional financial institutions first understand the value of Bitcoin, then consider developing their institutional business based on Ethereum, and finally, perhaps recognize the value of on-chain transactions. This is a typical path: question, understand, and become a part of it. Second, institutional holdings of the three major currencies show gradient differences The institutional holdings data of BTC, ETH, and SOL show obvious gradient differences, which also reflects the degree and rhythm of institutions' recognition of these three projects. Chart by: IOBC Capital From the comparison, we can see that institutional holdings of BTC and ETH account for > 18% of the circulating supply; SOL currently only accounts for 9.5%, and there may be room for replenishment. 3. SOL DAT: New Trends in Crypto Concept Stocks In the past month or so, 18 SOL DAT companies have come onto the scene, directly pushing SOL up by more than 50% from its August low. The louder SOL DAT company: Chart by: IOBC Capital Among the existing SOL DAT companies, Forward Industries, led by Multicoin Capital founder Kyle Samani, may become the SOL DAT leader. Unlike BTC DAT, which simply hoards coins, many SOL DAT companies will build their own Solana Validators, so that this is not limited to the "NAV game". Instead of simply waiting for token appreciation, they will continue to obtain cash flow income through the Validator business. This strategy is equivalent to "hoarding coins + mining", which is both long-term and profitable in the short term. 4. Crypto Concept Stocks: A Mapping of Capital Market Betting Crypto concept stocks are a new bridge between traditional capital and the crypto market. The degree of recognition of various Crypto businesses by the traditional financial market is also reflected in the stock price performance of crypto concept stocks. Chart by: IOBC Capital Looking back at the crypto stocks that have seen significant gains this round, we can see two common characteristics: 1. Only by betting big can a valuation reassessment be achieved. There are 189 publicly listed companies holding BTC, but only 30 hold 70% of their stock market capitalization, and only 12 hold more than 10,000 BTC—and these 12 have seen significant gains. A similar pattern is observed among listed ETH DATs. A superficial DAT strategy can only cause short-term stock price fluctuations and cannot substantially boost stock market capitalization or liquidity. 2. Business synergy can amplify commercial value. Transforming a single-point business into a multifaceted industry chain layout can amplify commercial value. For example, Robinhood, through its expansion into cryptocurrency trading, real-world asset trading (RRE), and participation in the USDG stablecoin, has formed a closed-loop business cycle for capital flow, leading to record highs in its stock price. Conversely, while Trump Media has also invested heavily in crypto (holding BTC, applying for an ETH ETF, and issuing tokens like Trump, Melania, and WLFI), the lack of synergy between its businesses has ultimately led to a lackluster market response to both its stock and its token. Ending The project philosophies of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana correspond to three instincts of human beings when facing the future: survival, order, and flow.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 19:00