The post Michael Saylor mixes up his ‘treasuries’ in misleading MSTR tweet appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) founder Michael Saylor has broadcasted many dubious claims over the years, but this week’s likening of MSTR to “digital treasuries” might take the cake. At first glance, Saylor’s tweet might mislead some into believing that he referred to MSTR as a type of treasury bond — as in a US Treasury. However, a careful review of the lengthy presentation attached to the tweet reveals that he merely meant to call Strategy — the business — a digital asset treasury (DAT). Still, the claim that MSTR is a company in the digital treasuries sector is still incredible just on the basis of dictionary definitions. Rather than an actual treasury that holds assets for a saver, Strategy holds bitcoin (BTC) that it repeatedly tells shareholders that they will never own. In numerous Security and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company emphatically tells MSTR shareholders that they don’t own Strategy’s BTC. “Ownership of our securities, including our class A common stock and preferred stock, does not represent an ownership interest in, or a redemption right with respect to, the bitcoin we hold,” it explains. This contrasts with the dictionary definition of treasury: a place in which stores of wealth are kept. No MSTR shareholder stores their BTC in Strategy’s treasury, and the BTC in Strategy’s treasury doesn’t store MSTR shareholders’ wealth. For months, the company has published variations of that disclaimer to clarify that MSTR isn’t a BTC treasury — by the company’s own admission — except in name only. MSTR: Not a treasury, not amplifying BTC recently During the same presentation, Saylor also called MSTR “amplified BTC.” That claim is equally incredible, albeit also vague enough to avoid the scrutiny of his first claim that MSTR is digital treasuries. Although it’s true that… The post Michael Saylor mixes up his ‘treasuries’ in misleading MSTR tweet appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) founder Michael Saylor has broadcasted many dubious claims over the years, but this week’s likening of MSTR to “digital treasuries” might take the cake. At first glance, Saylor’s tweet might mislead some into believing that he referred to MSTR as a type of treasury bond — as in a US Treasury. However, a careful review of the lengthy presentation attached to the tweet reveals that he merely meant to call Strategy — the business — a digital asset treasury (DAT). Still, the claim that MSTR is a company in the digital treasuries sector is still incredible just on the basis of dictionary definitions. Rather than an actual treasury that holds assets for a saver, Strategy holds bitcoin (BTC) that it repeatedly tells shareholders that they will never own. In numerous Security and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company emphatically tells MSTR shareholders that they don’t own Strategy’s BTC. “Ownership of our securities, including our class A common stock and preferred stock, does not represent an ownership interest in, or a redemption right with respect to, the bitcoin we hold,” it explains. This contrasts with the dictionary definition of treasury: a place in which stores of wealth are kept. No MSTR shareholder stores their BTC in Strategy’s treasury, and the BTC in Strategy’s treasury doesn’t store MSTR shareholders’ wealth. For months, the company has published variations of that disclaimer to clarify that MSTR isn’t a BTC treasury — by the company’s own admission — except in name only. MSTR: Not a treasury, not amplifying BTC recently During the same presentation, Saylor also called MSTR “amplified BTC.” That claim is equally incredible, albeit also vague enough to avoid the scrutiny of his first claim that MSTR is digital treasuries. Although it’s true that…

Michael Saylor mixes up his ‘treasuries’ in misleading MSTR tweet

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) founder Michael Saylor has broadcasted many dubious claims over the years, but this week’s likening of MSTR to “digital treasuries” might take the cake.

At first glance, Saylor’s tweet might mislead some into believing that he referred to MSTR as a type of treasury bond — as in a US Treasury.

However, a careful review of the lengthy presentation attached to the tweet reveals that he merely meant to call Strategy — the business — a digital asset treasury (DAT).

Still, the claim that MSTR is a company in the digital treasuries sector is still incredible just on the basis of dictionary definitions.

Rather than an actual treasury that holds assets for a saver, Strategy holds bitcoin (BTC) that it repeatedly tells shareholders that they will never own.

In numerous Security and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company emphatically tells MSTR shareholders that they don’t own Strategy’s BTC.

“Ownership of our securities, including our class A common stock and preferred stock, does not represent an ownership interest in, or a redemption right with respect to, the bitcoin we hold,” it explains.

This contrasts with the dictionary definition of treasury: a place in which stores of wealth are kept. No MSTR shareholder stores their BTC in Strategy’s treasury, and the BTC in Strategy’s treasury doesn’t store MSTR shareholders’ wealth.

For months, the company has published variations of that disclaimer to clarify that MSTR isn’t a BTC treasury — by the company’s own admission — except in name only.

MSTR: Not a treasury, not amplifying BTC recently

During the same presentation, Saylor also called MSTR “amplified BTC.”

That claim is equally incredible, albeit also vague enough to avoid the scrutiny of his first claim that MSTR is digital treasuries.

Although it’s true that the enterprise value of MSTR exceeds the value of the BTC that it holds by 21%, its multiple-to-Net Asset Value (mNAV) of 1.21x has been declining for over a year.

Read more: How Jim Chanos outplayed Michael Saylor: short MSTR, long BTC

Rather than amplifying the returns of BTC, any MSTR holder has lost money versus simply holding BTC since February 2024. Only over much longer timeframes has MSTR outperformed BTC.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/michael-saylor-mixes-up-his-treasuries-in-misleading-mstr-tweet/

Market Opportunity
Overtake Logo
Overtake Price(TAKE)
$0,04513
$0,04513$0,04513
+%0,82
USD
Overtake (TAKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP has traded near $1.90 as Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has predicted from Davos that the crypto market will reach new highs this year. Analysts have pointed
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 04:49
What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Wormhole Unleashes W 2.0 Tokenomics for a Connected Blockchain Future

Wormhole Unleashes W 2.0 Tokenomics for a Connected Blockchain Future

TLDR Wormhole reinvents W Tokenomics with Reserve, yield, and unlock upgrades. W Tokenomics: 4% yield, bi-weekly unlocks, and a sustainable Reserve Wormhole shifts to long-term value with treasury, yield, and smoother unlocks. Stakers earn 4% base yield as Wormhole optimizes unlocks for stability. Wormhole’s new Tokenomics align growth, yield, and stability for W holders. Wormhole [...] The post Wormhole Unleashes W 2.0 Tokenomics for a Connected Blockchain Future appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 02:07