TLDR Cardano network experienced a chain split on November 21 after a malformed transaction exploited a three-year-old bug in node software A developer named Homer J claimed responsibility, saying they relied on AI instructions and failed to test properly on testnet first Emergency patches were deployed within three hours and the network converged naturally by [...] The post Cardano Network Experiences First Major Chain Split in Eight Years appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR Cardano network experienced a chain split on November 21 after a malformed transaction exploited a three-year-old bug in node software A developer named Homer J claimed responsibility, saying they relied on AI instructions and failed to test properly on testnet first Emergency patches were deployed within three hours and the network converged naturally by [...] The post Cardano Network Experiences First Major Chain Split in Eight Years appeared first on Blockonomi.

Cardano Network Experiences First Major Chain Split in Eight Years

TLDR

  • Cardano network experienced a chain split on November 21 after a malformed transaction exploited a three-year-old bug in node software
  • A developer named Homer J claimed responsibility, saying they relied on AI instructions and failed to test properly on testnet first
  • Emergency patches were deployed within three hours and the network converged naturally by November 22
  • Charles Hoskinson involved the FBI, calling it a premeditated attack, which led to an IOG employee resigning over concerns about future legal consequences
  • ADA price dropped as much as 16% during the incident before recovering slightly, with exchanges pausing operations for up to 14 hours

Cardano experienced its first major chain split in eight years on November 21 when a developer exploited a three-year-old software bug. The incident temporarily divided the $14 billion blockchain into two competing chains.

The split began around 08:00 UTC when a malformed delegation transaction bypassed validation checks. Newer node versions accepted the transaction while older infrastructure rejected it. This created incompatible ledger states across the network.

The transaction exploited a deserialization bug that dated back to 2022. Evidence suggests the exploit was tested on Cardano’s testnet one day before being executed on the mainnet.

Despite the split, block production continued on both chains throughout the incident. At least some identical transactions appeared on both versions of the chain. Intersect, a Cardano ecosystem organization, emphasized that the network did not completely stall.

Major cryptocurrency exchanges responded by suspending ADA operations. Coinbase paused deposits and withdrawals for approximately 14 hours, from 12:15 UTC on November 21 through 02:10 UTC on November 22. Other exchanges including Upbit and Kraken implemented shorter pauses.

Block explorers froze or showed conflicting information during the partition. DeFi protocols experienced inconsistent states across the split. Transaction confirmation times, normally seconds on Cardano, stretched to minutes or failed entirely.

Emergency Response and Network Recovery

Development teams from Input Output Global, the Cardano Foundation, Intersect, and EMURGO coordinated an emergency response. Engineers deployed patches within three hours of detecting the issue.

The network converged through natural consensus by November 22. Independent stake pool operators, crypto exchanges, and engineers worked together to stabilize the chain. The recovery did not involve a centralized rollback.

Charles Hoskinson, Cardano’s founder, provided an official incident report addressing claims about the network. He confirmed that the mainnet never shut down and the core protocol was never compromised. The event was linked to an edge case in node implementation rather than a protocol failure.

An X user named Homer J publicly claimed responsibility for the chain split. The developer characterized their actions as a careless testing accident. They said they attempted to reproduce a bad transaction and relied on AI instructions without proper testnet verification first.

Hoskinson called the incident a premeditated attack and said the FBI was already involved. He rejected Homer J’s characterization of the event as an accident. Intersect confirmed that relevant authorities and law enforcement were being notified.

The decision to involve federal investigators prompted an IOG employee to resign. The developer, known as effectfully and identified as a Plutus language developer named Roman, expressed concern that future development mistakes could lead to legal consequences.

ADA’s price dropped as much as 16% following the incident before recovering slightly. The token currently trades at approximately $0.41. Intersect committed to conducting a full retrospective review and publishing a thorough report to prevent similar incidents.

The post Cardano Network Experiences First Major Chain Split in Eight Years appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.1191
$0.1191$0.1191
-2.47%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Both DeepSnitch AI and Digitap ($TAP) have been highlighted within some crypto communities for their distinct approaches. Although the two coins take a very different
Share
Crypto Ninjas2026/01/18 23:42
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15