Pseudonymous Pump.fun co-founder Sapijiju rejected claims that the project cashed out more than $436 million in stablecoins, calling the allegations “complete misinformation” from the blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain.
In an X post, Sapijiju addressed the report, insisting that none of the transferred funds were sold. He said the USDC originated from the PUMP token’s initial coin offering (ICO) and was simply redistributed to internal wallets as part of the company’s treasury management process.
“What’s happening is a part of Pump’s treasury management, where USDC from the $PUMP ICO has been transferred into different wallets so the company’s runway can be reinvested into the business,” Sapijiju. “Pump has never directly worked with Circle.”
Treasury management happens when a project allocates, stores and moves its funds, such as operating capital, ICO proceeds or reserves, to ensure it can continue running. The transfers don’t necessarily indicate selling and can involve wallet reorganization and preparing budgets for future developments.
Cointelegraph reached out to Lookonchain and Pump.fun, but had not received a response by publication.
Source: SapijijuFund movement sparked fears of selling pressure
Sapijiju’s comments came after Lookonchain reported that wallets linked to the Solana memecoin launchpad had moved $436 million in USDC to the crypto exchange Kraken since mid-October, which was widely interpreted as a large-scale cash-out.
The fund movements coincided with Pump’s monthly revenue falling below $40 million for the first time since July, declining to $27.3 million in November, according to DefiLlama data.
Despite this, data platforms DefiLlama, Arkham and Lookonchain showed that the Pump.fun-tagged wallet still held more than $855 million in stablecoins and $211 million in Solana (SOL).
Nicolai Sondergaard, research analyst at crypto intelligence platform Nansen, interpreted the perceived sell-off as a precursor to further selling. EmberCN said that the funds originated from institutional private placements of the PUMP token, rather than active dumping.
Source: LookonchainRelated: Memecoin market sinks to 2025 low as $5B wiped out in a day
Community split between skepticism, defense and calls for audits
The community’s response to Sapijiju’s explanation was divided. Some argued that the wording raised more questions, while others supported Pump.fun’s right to manage its own treasury.
X user Voss said there were contradictions in the statement, as the co-founder claimed it wasn’t involved in the transfer while also stating that they were managing their treasury. “Definitely didn’t just contradict yourself on a post you had 10 hrs to respond to,” Voss wrote.
Another community member, with the handle EthSheepwhale, dismissed Sapijiju’s announcement entirely and criticized what they described as “price manipulation via airdrops” and poor execution that left the token trading below its offering price.
CoinGecko data showed that the PUMP token traded at $0.002714, down 32% from its ICO price of $0.004. The token was also down by almost 70% from its September high of $0.0085.
Pump.fun price chart. Source: CoinGeckoSome community members offered more sympathy, saying the real issue reached beyond wallet flows to transparency about reserves.
User Matty.Sol said that Pump.fun had a right to deploy its revenue and ICO proceeds however it chose. “Nothing wrong even if it’s true. It’s your own revenue tho,” Matty wrote.
User Oga NFT said that moving USDC is what legitimate projects do after an ICO, and the key question was whether USDC reserves truly backed the circulating supply.
Magazine: Bitcoin whale Metaplanet ‘underwater’ but eyeing more BTC: Asia Express
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/pump-fun-cofounder-denies-436m-cash-out-treasury-management?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
