Polygon co-founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal suggested on Wednesday to his followers whether the network should revert to its original ticker, MATIC. He said he was curious what the broader community thinks about the initiative. Nailwal noted that the issue continues to surface in the Polygon trading community. He said that the community thinks MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker. The network’s co-founder also acknowledged that the ticker had history, recognition, and was stuck in people’s minds. Nailwal sees zero chance that exchanges will agree to the revert Thought Experiment: Time and again, I keep hearing from folks in the Polygon trading community that MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker — it had history, recognition, and stuck in people’s minds. So here’s an honest question: should we ask exchanges to revert just… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) November 25, 2025 Nailwal told the Polygon community that reverting the ticker to MATIC on exchanges is too much churn. He maintained that the network has already migrated to POL and should stick to it.  The firm’s CEO argued that a sufficient number of people are familiar with the POL ticker, especially in the X community. He revealed that the argument he keeps getting is that local businesses, which were aware of MATIC, wonder where the digital asset went. “The counter-argument I keep getting is: the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went.” –Sandeep Nailwal, Co-Founder and CEO of Polygon. Nailwal added that another debate he encounters is that projects shouldn’t be basing their decisions on what the X community thinks. He argued that Crypto Twitter represents less than 5% of the total crypto trading population. Polygon’s CEO also disclosed that the recurring feedback from the community made him curious about what the broader community thinks about a revert. He believes that there are zero guarantees that exchanges will agree to the initiative, but still hinted that it might be a significant upgrade on their end. Crypto officials ponder the revert Abhinav Mehta, head of partnerships at Mansa Finance, argued that the revert is unnecessary, saying that change doesn’t happen overnight. He urged Nailwal not to double-think the decision.  Mehta said there’s no point in calling Polygon a chain that went from one name to another just because others didn’t hear about it and ended up changing it back to the original. One member of the Polygon community believes the network should do more to promote POL, including more brand deals to boost mainstream adoption. President of Open Campus, Mo Ezeldin, said the early adopters and supporters of Polygon recognized the token as MATIC. He also noted that there hasn’t been a new wave of retail entrants into the POL ecosystem. Ezeldin believes that going back to the original ticker might actually be the play for the network. Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-founder of ZIG Chain, acknowledged that MATIC had a different vibe to it. He also argued that reverting the ticker wouldn’t solve the network’s core problem. He said the old chart has already reset, and it won’t come back. Peter Kim, a marketer at Coinbase, suggested that Nailwal should focus on marketing POL better. He urged Polygon to start by putting the POL ticker name in official Polygon X accounts. He also believes that relisting POL on Robinhood might go a long way in its recognition. Polygon upgraded its PoS to POL in September 2024 as the native staking token. A year later, the network announced that the upgrade to MATIC had successfully reached 99%.  The firm maintained that the Polygon Portal interface still offers a 1:1 migration for users still holding MATIC. Polygon revealed that the upgrade provided more utility to the network’s cross-chain ecosystem interoperability solution, Agglayer.  Polygon also disclosed that the network’s PoS will soon integrate with Agglayer. The firm stated that the initiative aims to bring POL into the broader aggregated network. At the time of publication, POL is trading at $0.1367, up by roughly 1% in the last 24 hours. POL has also plummeted more than 2.61% in the past 7 days and nearly 33% in the past 30 days. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.Polygon co-founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal suggested on Wednesday to his followers whether the network should revert to its original ticker, MATIC. He said he was curious what the broader community thinks about the initiative. Nailwal noted that the issue continues to surface in the Polygon trading community. He said that the community thinks MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker. The network’s co-founder also acknowledged that the ticker had history, recognition, and was stuck in people’s minds. Nailwal sees zero chance that exchanges will agree to the revert Thought Experiment: Time and again, I keep hearing from folks in the Polygon trading community that MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker — it had history, recognition, and stuck in people’s minds. So here’s an honest question: should we ask exchanges to revert just… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) November 25, 2025 Nailwal told the Polygon community that reverting the ticker to MATIC on exchanges is too much churn. He maintained that the network has already migrated to POL and should stick to it.  The firm’s CEO argued that a sufficient number of people are familiar with the POL ticker, especially in the X community. He revealed that the argument he keeps getting is that local businesses, which were aware of MATIC, wonder where the digital asset went. “The counter-argument I keep getting is: the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went.” –Sandeep Nailwal, Co-Founder and CEO of Polygon. Nailwal added that another debate he encounters is that projects shouldn’t be basing their decisions on what the X community thinks. He argued that Crypto Twitter represents less than 5% of the total crypto trading population. Polygon’s CEO also disclosed that the recurring feedback from the community made him curious about what the broader community thinks about a revert. He believes that there are zero guarantees that exchanges will agree to the initiative, but still hinted that it might be a significant upgrade on their end. Crypto officials ponder the revert Abhinav Mehta, head of partnerships at Mansa Finance, argued that the revert is unnecessary, saying that change doesn’t happen overnight. He urged Nailwal not to double-think the decision.  Mehta said there’s no point in calling Polygon a chain that went from one name to another just because others didn’t hear about it and ended up changing it back to the original. One member of the Polygon community believes the network should do more to promote POL, including more brand deals to boost mainstream adoption. President of Open Campus, Mo Ezeldin, said the early adopters and supporters of Polygon recognized the token as MATIC. He also noted that there hasn’t been a new wave of retail entrants into the POL ecosystem. Ezeldin believes that going back to the original ticker might actually be the play for the network. Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-founder of ZIG Chain, acknowledged that MATIC had a different vibe to it. He also argued that reverting the ticker wouldn’t solve the network’s core problem. He said the old chart has already reset, and it won’t come back. Peter Kim, a marketer at Coinbase, suggested that Nailwal should focus on marketing POL better. He urged Polygon to start by putting the POL ticker name in official Polygon X accounts. He also believes that relisting POL on Robinhood might go a long way in its recognition. Polygon upgraded its PoS to POL in September 2024 as the native staking token. A year later, the network announced that the upgrade to MATIC had successfully reached 99%.  The firm maintained that the Polygon Portal interface still offers a 1:1 migration for users still holding MATIC. Polygon revealed that the upgrade provided more utility to the network’s cross-chain ecosystem interoperability solution, Agglayer.  Polygon also disclosed that the network’s PoS will soon integrate with Agglayer. The firm stated that the initiative aims to bring POL into the broader aggregated network. At the time of publication, POL is trading at $0.1367, up by roughly 1% in the last 24 hours. POL has also plummeted more than 2.61% in the past 7 days and nearly 33% in the past 30 days. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal raises concerns that the community suggests reverting to MATIC

2025/11/27 03:30
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Polygon co-founder and CEO Sandeep Nailwal suggested on Wednesday to his followers whether the network should revert to its original ticker, MATIC. He said he was curious what the broader community thinks about the initiative.

Nailwal noted that the issue continues to surface in the Polygon trading community. He said that the community thinks MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker. The network’s co-founder also acknowledged that the ticker had history, recognition, and was stuck in people’s minds.

Nailwal sees zero chance that exchanges will agree to the revert

Nailwal told the Polygon community that reverting the ticker to MATIC on exchanges is too much churn. He maintained that the network has already migrated to POL and should stick to it. 

The firm’s CEO argued that a sufficient number of people are familiar with the POL ticker, especially in the X community. He revealed that the argument he keeps getting is that local businesses, which were aware of MATIC, wonder where the digital asset went.

Nailwal added that another debate he encounters is that projects shouldn’t be basing their decisions on what the X community thinks. He argued that Crypto Twitter represents less than 5% of the total crypto trading population.

Polygon’s CEO also disclosed that the recurring feedback from the community made him curious about what the broader community thinks about a revert. He believes that there are zero guarantees that exchanges will agree to the initiative, but still hinted that it might be a significant upgrade on their end.

Crypto officials ponder the revert

Abhinav Mehta, head of partnerships at Mansa Finance, argued that the revert is unnecessary, saying that change doesn’t happen overnight. He urged Nailwal not to double-think the decision. 

Mehta said there’s no point in calling Polygon a chain that went from one name to another just because others didn’t hear about it and ended up changing it back to the original. One member of the Polygon community believes the network should do more to promote POL, including more brand deals to boost mainstream adoption.

President of Open Campus, Mo Ezeldin, said the early adopters and supporters of Polygon recognized the token as MATIC. He also noted that there hasn’t been a new wave of retail entrants into the POL ecosystem. Ezeldin believes that going back to the original ticker might actually be the play for the network.

Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-founder of ZIG Chain, acknowledged that MATIC had a different vibe to it. He also argued that reverting the ticker wouldn’t solve the network’s core problem. He said the old chart has already reset, and it won’t come back.

Peter Kim, a marketer at Coinbase, suggested that Nailwal should focus on marketing POL better. He urged Polygon to start by putting the POL ticker name in official Polygon X accounts. He also believes that relisting POL on Robinhood might go a long way in its recognition.

Polygon upgraded its PoS to POL in September 2024 as the native staking token. A year later, the network announced that the upgrade to MATIC had successfully reached 99%. 

The firm maintained that the Polygon Portal interface still offers a 1:1 migration for users still holding MATIC. Polygon revealed that the upgrade provided more utility to the network’s cross-chain ecosystem interoperability solution, Agglayer. 

Polygon also disclosed that the network’s PoS will soon integrate with Agglayer. The firm stated that the initiative aims to bring POL into the broader aggregated network.

At the time of publication, POL is trading at $0.1367, up by roughly 1% in the last 24 hours. POL has also plummeted more than 2.61% in the past 7 days and nearly 33% in the past 30 days.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Market Opportunity
Farcana Logo
Farcana Price(FAR)
$0.001934
$0.001934$0.001934
+19.23%
USD
Farcana (FAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

The post 3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Analyses and data indicate that the crypto market is experiencing its most active altcoin season since early 2025, with many altcoins outperforming Bitcoin. However, behind this excitement lies a paradox. Most retail investors remain uneasy as their portfolios show little to no profit. This article outlines the main reasons behind this situation. Altcoin Market Cap Rises but Dominance Shrinks Sponsored TradingView data shows that the TOTAL3 market cap (excluding BTC and ETH) reached a new high of over $1.1 trillion in September. Yet the share of OTHERS (excluding the top 10) has declined since 2022, now standing at just 8%. OTHERS Dominance And TOTAL3 Capitalization. Source: TradingView. In past cycles, such as 2017 and 2021, TOTAL3 and OTHERS.D rose together. That trend reflected capital flowing not only into large-cap altcoins but also into mid-cap and low-cap ones. The current divergence shows that capital is concentrated in stablecoins and a handful of top-10 altcoins such as SOL, XRP, BNB, DOG, HYPE, and LINK. Smaller altcoins receive far less liquidity, making it hard for their prices to return to levels where investors previously bought. This creates a situation where only a few win while most face losses. Retail investors also tend to diversify across many coins instead of adding size to top altcoins. That explains why many portfolios remain stagnant despite a broader market rally. Sponsored “Position sizing is everything. Many people hold 25–30 tokens at once. A 100x on a token that makes up only 1% of your portfolio won’t meaningfully change your life. It’s better to make a few high-conviction bets than to overdiversify,” analyst The DeFi Investor said. Altcoin Index Surges but Investor Sentiment Remains Cautious The Altcoin Season Index from Blockchain Center now stands at 80 points. This indicates that over 80% of the top 50 altcoins outperformed…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:43