The post If humans vanished, Bitcoin’s block time and difficulty would preserve our collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a speculative report translated for non-specialists. The narrator is an investigator who arrived long after humans were gone. Everything described as measured relies on real Bitcoin mechanics: block intervals, difficulty/target, timestamp rules, and data available from block headers and the coinbase transaction. We arrived on a silent planet. The last clocks still ticking were embedded in a ledger whose authors were gone. REPORT START Team: Survey Unit 3Artifact: Global ledger (“Bitcoin”)Technique: Lightweight chain analysis (headers + coinbase), mapped to solar time Method We analyzed the digital artifact known as Bitcoin using what we identified as block headers (timestamp, target / “bits”, version) and each block’s coinbase transaction (height, output value, and tag text). From our previous initial review we’ve constructed the following data points: Fees were treated as: coinbase output − programmed subsidy (fees actually claimed by the miner). Timestamps were calibrated to the planet’s solar day and year and bounded by Bitcoin’s median-time-past (MTP) rule. Evidence of tip contention (stale blocks) was inferred from timing irregularities and MTP edge effects; where any stale-block archives survived on isolated nodes, they corroborated those periods. Difficulty retargets occurred every 2016 blocks with the actual_timespan clamped to 0.25×–4× of the two-week target, implying a per-epoch difficulty change bounded to at most 4× in either direction. Findings Cessation of payments We recorded ΔH (blocks before present) to be ≈ 86,000. Coinbase outputs were equal to the programmed subsidy, implying fees ≈ 0. Over that same interval, average block spacing settled near ~60–70 minutes with a long-segment mean of ~65 minutes. Interpretation: Human-directed payments had ceased. Mechanical issuance continued.Dating: 86,000 blocks × ~65 minutes ≈ ~10.6 years before our arrival. Power-source timing signatures Post-collapse block arrivals were not memoryless. Diurnal and seasonal cadence encoded the unattended power mix: Daytime clusters with nighttime gaps… The post If humans vanished, Bitcoin’s block time and difficulty would preserve our collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a speculative report translated for non-specialists. The narrator is an investigator who arrived long after humans were gone. Everything described as measured relies on real Bitcoin mechanics: block intervals, difficulty/target, timestamp rules, and data available from block headers and the coinbase transaction. We arrived on a silent planet. The last clocks still ticking were embedded in a ledger whose authors were gone. REPORT START Team: Survey Unit 3Artifact: Global ledger (“Bitcoin”)Technique: Lightweight chain analysis (headers + coinbase), mapped to solar time Method We analyzed the digital artifact known as Bitcoin using what we identified as block headers (timestamp, target / “bits”, version) and each block’s coinbase transaction (height, output value, and tag text). From our previous initial review we’ve constructed the following data points: Fees were treated as: coinbase output − programmed subsidy (fees actually claimed by the miner). Timestamps were calibrated to the planet’s solar day and year and bounded by Bitcoin’s median-time-past (MTP) rule. Evidence of tip contention (stale blocks) was inferred from timing irregularities and MTP edge effects; where any stale-block archives survived on isolated nodes, they corroborated those periods. Difficulty retargets occurred every 2016 blocks with the actual_timespan clamped to 0.25×–4× of the two-week target, implying a per-epoch difficulty change bounded to at most 4× in either direction. Findings Cessation of payments We recorded ΔH (blocks before present) to be ≈ 86,000. Coinbase outputs were equal to the programmed subsidy, implying fees ≈ 0. Over that same interval, average block spacing settled near ~60–70 minutes with a long-segment mean of ~65 minutes. Interpretation: Human-directed payments had ceased. Mechanical issuance continued.Dating: 86,000 blocks × ~65 minutes ≈ ~10.6 years before our arrival. Power-source timing signatures Post-collapse block arrivals were not memoryless. Diurnal and seasonal cadence encoded the unattended power mix: Daytime clusters with nighttime gaps…

If humans vanished, Bitcoin’s block time and difficulty would preserve our collapse

This is a speculative report translated for non-specialists. The narrator is an investigator who arrived long after humans were gone. Everything described as measured relies on real Bitcoin mechanics: block intervals, difficulty/target, timestamp rules, and data available from block headers and the coinbase transaction.


REPORT START

Team: Survey Unit 3
Artifact: Global ledger (“Bitcoin”)
Technique: Lightweight chain analysis (headers + coinbase), mapped to solar time

Method

We analyzed the digital artifact known as Bitcoin using what we identified as block headers (timestamp, target / “bits”, version) and each block’s coinbase transaction (height, output value, and tag text).

From our previous initial review we’ve constructed the following data points:

  • Fees were treated as: coinbase output − programmed subsidy (fees actually claimed by the miner).
  • Timestamps were calibrated to the planet’s solar day and year and bounded by Bitcoin’s median-time-past (MTP) rule.
  • Evidence of tip contention (stale blocks) was inferred from timing irregularities and MTP edge effects; where any stale-block archives survived on isolated nodes, they corroborated those periods.
  • Difficulty retargets occurred every 2016 blocks with the actual_timespan clamped to 0.25×–4× of the two-week target, implying a per-epoch difficulty change bounded to at most in either direction.

Findings

Cessation of payments

We recorded ΔH (blocks before present) to be ≈ 86,000. Coinbase outputs were equal to the programmed subsidy, implying fees ≈ 0. Over that same interval, average block spacing settled near ~60–70 minutes with a long-segment mean of ~65 minutes.

Interpretation: Human-directed payments had ceased. Mechanical issuance continued.
Dating: 86,000 blocks × ~65 minutes ≈ ~10.6 years before our arrival.

Power-source timing signatures

Post-collapse block arrivals were not memoryless. Diurnal and seasonal cadence encoded the unattended power mix:

  • Daytime clusters with nighttime gaps repeated across low-latitude longitudes → unattended solar with degrading storage.
  • Irregular multi-hour bursts punctuated by multi-day voids at mid-latitudes → wind that faulted during storms and wasn’t reset.
  • Persistent overnight presence at a few longitudes → small hydro or geothermal operating islanded.

We aligned repeated intraday timestamp clusters to local solar noon to estimate longitude bands of surviving sites. The strength of seasonal variation in block arrivals gave coarse latitude bands. Precise site coordinates were not recoverable.

Difficulty terraces (the fade, timed)

Immediately after the hashrate shock, average block time jumped from ~10 minutes to hours. Because difficulty only retargets every 2016 blocks and each epoch’s change is bounded, the chain formed terraces, plateaus of near-constant average interval separated by discrete down-steps.

Representative sequence observed in the global ledger:

  • Terrace A: ~16–17 h/block for 2016 blocks → elapsed ~3.8 years.
  • Terrace B: ~4.1 h/block for 2016 blocks~0.95 years.
  • Terrace C: ~62–65 min/block for 2016 blocks~87–91 days.
  • Terrace D: ~15–16 min/block for ~22 days, after which renewed hardware failures re-slowed the chain.

Where residual hashrate was ≈1% of pre-event, Terrace A alone spanned ~3.8 years at ~16.7 h/block. At ≈0.1%, the same 2016-block epoch would have stretched to ~38 years at ~167 h/block, still within the protocol’s adjustment bound. One region’s cadence matched the ~16–17 h/block case.

How to read a terrace (worked calc):

Epoch length = 2016 blocks. If the observed interval on a plateau is 16.7 hours, elapsed time for that epoch ≈ 2016 × 16.7 h ≈ 3.84 years.

Network decay captured in the record

Once accurate clocks vanished, miner timestamps drifted in coherent regional patterns. Bitcoin’s MTP rule limited abuse of timestamps (each new block had to be later than the median of the prior 11) but did not eliminate drift signatures.

Interval variance and clustered MTP-bounded timestamp advances revealed intermittent partitions and tip contention; when any link resumed (e.g., satellite, microwave), competing branches reconciled and only the winning branch remained canonical.

Without preserved stale-block archives, measured contention is a lower bound.

Maker marks that outlived their makers

Coinbase tag strings (pool labels) and stable nonce/version fingerprints persisted for years after fee activity ended. Defaults were never changed once operators were gone, leaving software/hardware families identifiable in the record. (Coinbase tags are visible via the coinbase transaction; headers alone do not carry them.)

Dating key events (worked examples)

  • “Payments ended.” Window where coinbase output = subsidy began at ΔH ≈ 86,000. Using the observed ~65 min/block: ~10.6 years before present.
  • First post-shock retarget completed. The initial 2016-block reduction finished ~3.8 years after the hashrate collapse (plateau at ~16.7 h/block).
  • Final detectable hydro cadence. The last night-heavy, near-constant signature ceased ~1.9 years before present; the prior seven spring seasons showed increasing multi-day outages consistent with intake clogging and flood damage.

All conversions use observed segment averages, not the nominal 10-minute target.

Duration estimate (how long machines ran)

  • Minimum confirmed: >10 years after economic activity ceased (from fee collapse to last hydro-like cadence).
  • Plausible upper bound (regional): Multi-decadal operation at extremely low hashrate, where a single 2016-block epoch spans decades due to the adjustment bound.

The only requirements were: (a) at least one surviving power source and (b) an intermittent path for some blocks to reach the global network.

Summary report

Ultimately, the ledger shows when payments stopped, how energy tapered, how networks frayed, and how long unattended machines kept writing time, enough to reconstruct the end of activity from headers and coinbase alone.

END OF REPORT


What readers should take from this

  • Bitcoin behaves like an instrument. Difficulty rules and timestamp constraints transduce physical reality, power availability, operator absence, and network partitions into a durable time series.
  • Physical failure, not price, ended the write. Dust, clogged screens, tripped breakers, drifting clocks, broken links.
  • These forensics apply today. Block spacing, fee pressure (via coinbase delta), timestamp drift, and retarget dynamics are actionable diagnostics for present-day outages and partitions.

Limits

  • Longitude bands were estimable; precise sites were not. Latitude was inferred only coarsely from seasonality strength.
  • Fully isolated “shadow mining” may have produced blocks that never reached the global ledger.
  • Without preserved stale-block archives, contention estimates are lower bounds; some races leave no canonical trace.
  • Once synchronized time sources failed, MTP primarily preserved relative ordering, not accurate civil time; long-range calendar dates carry additional uncertainty even when intraday/seasonal structure is clear.
  • In very low-hashrate regimes dominated by a single surviving operator, timestamps could be marched within MTP limits, partially masking diurnal signatures; cross-checks with nonce patterns and coinbase tags mitigate but do not eliminate this.
  • Most OP_RETURN payloads were not decodable at scale and were not interpreted.

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/alien-btc-findings-if-humans-vanished-bitcoins-block-time-and-difficulty-would-preserve-our-collapse/

Market Opportunity
Blockstreet Logo
Blockstreet Price(BLOCK)
$0,016358
$0,016358$0,016358
+1,00%
USD
Blockstreet (BLOCK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
Modernizing Legacy E-Commerce Platforms: From Oracle ATG To Cloud-Native Architectures

Modernizing Legacy E-Commerce Platforms: From Oracle ATG To Cloud-Native Architectures

Oracle ATG Commerce was the platform of record for large enterprises for many years. But the e-commerce game has changed, and now, speed, agility, and scalability are the name of the game.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 04:42
EUR/CHF slides as Euro struggles post-inflation data

EUR/CHF slides as Euro struggles post-inflation data

The post EUR/CHF slides as Euro struggles post-inflation data appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. EUR/CHF weakens for a second straight session as the euro struggles to recover post-Eurozone inflation data. Eurozone core inflation steady at 2.3%, headline CPI eases to 2.0% in August. SNB maintains a flexible policy outlook ahead of its September 25 decision, with no immediate need for easing. The Euro (EUR) trades under pressure against the Swiss Franc (CHF) on Wednesday, with EUR/CHF extending losses for the second straight session as the common currency struggles to gain traction following Eurozone inflation data. At the time of writing, the cross is trading around 0.9320 during the American session. The latest inflation data from Eurostat showed that Eurozone price growth remained broadly stable in August, reinforcing the European Central Bank’s (ECB) cautious stance on monetary policy. The Core Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP), which excludes volatile items such as food and energy, rose 2.3% YoY, in line with both forecasts and the previous month’s reading. On a monthly basis, core inflation increased by 0.3%, unchanged from July, highlighting persistent underlying price pressures in the bloc. Meanwhile, headline inflation eased to 2.0% YoY in August, down from 2.1% in July and slightly below expectations. On a monthly basis, prices rose just 0.1%, missing forecasts for a 0.2% increase and decelerating from July’s 0.2% rise. The inflation release follows last week’s ECB policy decision, where the central bank kept all three key interest rates unchanged and signaled that policy is likely at its terminal level. While officials acknowledged progress in bringing inflation down, they reiterated a cautious, data-dependent approach going forward, emphasizing the need to maintain restrictive conditions for an extended period to ensure price stability. On the Swiss side, disinflation appears to be deepening. The Producer and Import Price Index dropped 0.6% in August, marking a sharp 1.8% annual decline. Broader inflation remains…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:08