The post Supreme Court Hears Campaign Finance Case Today—Here’s How It Could Impact Big-Money Donors appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will consider Tuesday whether to get rid of limits on how much political parties can spend coordinating with candidates, hearing a case brought by Republican candidates including Vice President J.D. Vance and potentially paving the way for wealthy donors to spend thousands more directly supporting candidates’ campaigns. Vice President JD Vance participates in a fireside chat at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on November 20 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), a case brought by Republican campaign committees, Vice President J.D. Vance—from his time as a senator—and former Rep. Steven Joseph Chabot, R-Ohio. The case challenges a longstanding rule that limits how much political parties can spend coordinating directly with candidates, meaning payments for goods and services that directly benefit a candidate’s campaign. In 2025, those limits range from $63,600 for House races for states with more than one congressional district, to $3,946,100 for Senate races in the most populous states, and parties’ coordinated spending was capped at $32,392,200 in the 2024 presidential election. The Republicans challenging the limits argue that the cap violates the First Amendment and doesn’t work as a deterrent to bribery or “quid pro quo” schemes, because other rules that prevent earmarking donations for specific purposes make it “implausible” that a donor would try to bribe a candidate by donating to a political party. The FEC initially defended the limits under the Biden administration, but the Trump administration switched the government’s position and said it thinks the limits should be struck down, so the court appointed a separate lawyer to argue in favor of keeping the policy. What To Watch For The court will hear oral arguments Tuesday and issue a ruling at… The post Supreme Court Hears Campaign Finance Case Today—Here’s How It Could Impact Big-Money Donors appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will consider Tuesday whether to get rid of limits on how much political parties can spend coordinating with candidates, hearing a case brought by Republican candidates including Vice President J.D. Vance and potentially paving the way for wealthy donors to spend thousands more directly supporting candidates’ campaigns. Vice President JD Vance participates in a fireside chat at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on November 20 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), a case brought by Republican campaign committees, Vice President J.D. Vance—from his time as a senator—and former Rep. Steven Joseph Chabot, R-Ohio. The case challenges a longstanding rule that limits how much political parties can spend coordinating directly with candidates, meaning payments for goods and services that directly benefit a candidate’s campaign. In 2025, those limits range from $63,600 for House races for states with more than one congressional district, to $3,946,100 for Senate races in the most populous states, and parties’ coordinated spending was capped at $32,392,200 in the 2024 presidential election. The Republicans challenging the limits argue that the cap violates the First Amendment and doesn’t work as a deterrent to bribery or “quid pro quo” schemes, because other rules that prevent earmarking donations for specific purposes make it “implausible” that a donor would try to bribe a candidate by donating to a political party. The FEC initially defended the limits under the Biden administration, but the Trump administration switched the government’s position and said it thinks the limits should be struck down, so the court appointed a separate lawyer to argue in favor of keeping the policy. What To Watch For The court will hear oral arguments Tuesday and issue a ruling at…

Supreme Court Hears Campaign Finance Case Today—Here’s How It Could Impact Big-Money Donors

2025/12/10 00:27

Topline

The Supreme Court will consider Tuesday whether to get rid of limits on how much political parties can spend coordinating with candidates, hearing a case brought by Republican candidates including Vice President J.D. Vance and potentially paving the way for wealthy donors to spend thousands more directly supporting candidates’ campaigns.

Vice President JD Vance participates in a fireside chat at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on November 20 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images

Key Facts

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), a case brought by Republican campaign committees, Vice President J.D. Vance—from his time as a senator—and former Rep. Steven Joseph Chabot, R-Ohio.

The case challenges a longstanding rule that limits how much political parties can spend coordinating directly with candidates, meaning payments for goods and services that directly benefit a candidate’s campaign.

In 2025, those limits range from $63,600 for House races for states with more than one congressional district, to $3,946,100 for Senate races in the most populous states, and parties’ coordinated spending was capped at $32,392,200 in the 2024 presidential election.

The Republicans challenging the limits argue that the cap violates the First Amendment and doesn’t work as a deterrent to bribery or “quid pro quo” schemes, because other rules that prevent earmarking donations for specific purposes make it “implausible” that a donor would try to bribe a candidate by donating to a political party.

The FEC initially defended the limits under the Biden administration, but the Trump administration switched the government’s position and said it thinks the limits should be struck down, so the court appointed a separate lawyer to argue in favor of keeping the policy.

What To Watch For

The court will hear oral arguments Tuesday and issue a ruling at some point during the coming months. A decision will come out before the court’s term ends in late June 2026, so whatever the court decides will affect fundraising in the 2026 midterm elections.

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/09/supreme-court-could-soon-abolish-another-limit-on-big-money-political-donations-what-to-know-as-case-heard-today/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21
Why is Bitcoin (BTC) Trading Lower Today?

Why is Bitcoin (BTC) Trading Lower Today?

The post Why is Bitcoin (BTC) Trading Lower Today? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin BTC$90,457.05, the leading cryptocurrency by market value, is down following the overnight Fed rate cut. The reason likely lies in the Fed’s messaging, which has made traders less excited about future easing. The Fed on Wednesday cut the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 3.25% as expected and announced it will begin purchasing short-term Treasury bills to manage liquidity in the banking system. Yet, BTC traded below $90,000 at press time, representing a 2.4% decline since early Asian trading hours, according to CoinDesk data. Ether was down 4% at $3,190, with the CoinDesk 20 Index down over 4%. The risk-off action is likely due to growing signs of internal Fed divisions on balancing inflation control against employment goals, coupled with signals of a more challenging path for future rate cuts. Two members voted for no change on Wednesday, but individual forecasts revealed that six FOMC members felt that a cut wasn’t “appropriate.” Besides, the central bank suggested just one more rate cut in 2026, disappointing expectations for two to three rate cuts. “The Fed is divided, and the market has no real insight into the future path of rates from now until May 2026, when Chairman Jerome Powell will be replaced. The replacement of Powell with a Trump loyalist (who will push to lower rates aggressively) is likely the most reliable signal for rates. Until then, however, there are still 6 months to go,” Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata, told CoinDesk. He added that the most likely occurrence as of now is a needed “deleveraging” or down-market” to convince the Fed of lower rates decidedly. Shiliang Tang, managing partner of Monarq Asset Management, said BTC is following the stock market lower. “Crypto markets initially spiked on the news but have steadily moved lower since, in conjunction with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 17:27