Written by: Rishabh Gupta Compiled by: Jia Huan, ChainCatcher As a fledgling founder, I poured years of effort into three infrastructure projects that ultimatelyWritten by: Rishabh Gupta Compiled by: Jia Huan, ChainCatcher As a fledgling founder, I poured years of effort into three infrastructure projects that ultimately

After botching three projects and being rejected 500 times, I finally grasped the true essence of Web3 entrepreneurship on Solana.

2025/12/31 16:14

Written by: Rishabh Gupta

Compiled by: Jia Huan, ChainCatcher

As a fledgling founder, I poured years of effort into three infrastructure projects that ultimately failed. In 2025, I began building a consumer product that people truly wanted to use. Here, I share my painful lessons learned in user acquisition and fundraising.

I've been in this industry for about four years.

In 2023, when "account abstraction" was still the hottest topic in the industry, I started developing within the EVM ecosystem. At that time, everyone was developing SDKs (Software Development Kits) for account abstraction wallets. Rollup scaling solutions were also very popular—Optimism, Arbitrum, and various RaaS (Rollup as a Service) dominated.

As a math enthusiast, I am deeply attracted to ZK (zero-knowledge proofs) and believe it will change the world (and I firmly believe it will in the future).

I once mistakenly believed that complexity equals credibility.

When VCs asked about application scenarios, I would confidently list zkML (zero-knowledge machine learning), zk identity, and zk voting—but to this day, these areas remain largely unused. I mistakenly identified amazing technology as a useful product.

Over time, I've come to believe that the more complex an idea is, the greater its chances of success.

VCs also told me that in the crypto space, building infrastructure is the only way to succeed.

It took me nearly two years and over 500 rejections to realize that this wasn't right for me.

Entering the Solana Ecosystem

This is a completely new ecosystem for me—people here care about use cases. Even Meme coins don't matter, because revenue is important.

Speed is important. Distribution is important.

I've been building consumer applications with Solana for 7 months now, and here are my thoughts:

1. Built for young users who are willing to try new things

Try developing for young people who are naturally open to new products.

In the consumer crypto space, this typically means people who can trade in the "trench" or young users aged 13-21.

A 2024 study by the Consumer Technology Association showed that 86% of Gen Z (aged 11-26) consider technology to be central to their lives—a higher percentage than any previous generation. They own more devices and are more willing to spend on technology products.

They are more willing to try new apps, experiment with new features, and change their habits.

Users over 25 years old are generally less willing to adopt new operating procedures unless there is a very strong incentive.

Research shows that social activity peaks around the age of 20-21. This means that products designed for young people naturally have higher viral potential.

2. Make the product inherently "spreadable" to reduce marketing costs.

If you don't have a huge marketing or advertising budget, the product itself must be the traffic channel.

In the field of encryption, transmissibility is particularly important because:

KOL marketing is very expensive.

The level of trust is extremely low.

Everyone expects rewards or incentives.

If your product gives users a reason to spontaneously share it with friends and communities, you've won publicity without burning money. It's difficult, but worth optimizing from day one.

3. Launch the features requested by users as soon as possible.

When users report a poor experience or bugs, please fix them immediately, especially the pain points that hinder use.

I used to apply patches all at the end of the day. But then a user messaged me saying, "Since your app doesn't have this feature, I'll switch to product Y."

Once users go to competitors and form a habit, it's very difficult to bring them back.

Therefore, try to fix it immediately (ideally within 2-5 hours).

If multiple users request a certain feature and it is feasible:

It can be made in 2-3 days.

Tell them this was launched based on their feedback.

You could even give them some rewards.

This builds a deep level of trust. Users begin to feel that the product "belongs to them," and this sense of belonging is incredibly powerful in early-stage products.

4. The application name is very important.

It seems simple, but many people (including myself) have messed it up.

The application name should be highly recognizable and easy to share verbally.

My previous product was called "Encifher," a name that was extremely difficult to remember; even investors and partners would misspell it when creating group chats.

So we later changed it to encrypt.trade. It's concise, easy to remember, and stylish.

5. Communicating with users is difficult, but it's necessary.

Finding and engaging with users is extremely difficult, especially when what you're building isn't part of the current "hot narrative."

When I started working on privacy, it wasn't popular. I reached out to nearly 1,000 people via cold-start messaging: maybe 10 out of 100 would reply. Of those, only 3-4 offered any real help.

I talk to anyone who shows even the slightest interest.

I worked with them to iterate the product.

The Cold-DM framework is also an iterative process. Here are some key points to note:

  • Begin with a warm greeting.
  • Put the highlights (financing situation, transaction volume, etc.) at the beginning.
  • Explain where you found them.
  • Give a friendly call to action.
  • Always remember to follow up.

There is no perfect Cold-DM; you must test against each other to find an effective approach for your target customers.

Here is a decent Cold-DM template available: but be aware that the process is slow and tedious.

In the cryptocurrency community, few people reply to DMs because scams are everywhere.

Low response rates are the norm (which is a bit frustrating, I know).

Nevertheless, you must do this.

Your goal is not to acquire 1,000 users at this stage.

Your goal is 10-20 early adopters who care about the issues, are willing to try the product, and will provide honest feedback.

These early users will become your support system.

Early products often have bugs, and these users will help you get through that phase.

6. Rapid iteration

The crypto industry is constantly changing, and attention spans are extremely short.

You must study user behavior, not just listen to their language:

What are they doing repeatedly?

What kind of compromise are they using?

What are people already willing to pay for? (Many ideas sound good, but they can't survive if users aren't willing to pay for them.)

7. Make your website so simple it's "foolproof".

Never make any assumptions about how users perceive things.

As a developer, you may have stared at the product for hundreds of hours and find it obvious, but it may be completely unfamiliar to someone entering the field for the first time.

Avoid introducing new terminology or complex processes.

Minimize the number of clicks.

The core value should be presented within 5 seconds of entering the app.

Conclusion

Building consumer-grade encrypted products is both fun and challenging. Speed of iteration, user-centric thinking, and marketing prowess are more important than perfect technology. This is completely different from B2B.

Market Opportunity
ConstitutionDAO Logo
ConstitutionDAO Price(PEOPLE)
$0.009169
$0.009169$0.009169
-1.33%
USD
ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer […] The post Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:13
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

PANews reported on December 31 that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to study in 2026 whether certain crypto assets can be classified as cash
Share
PANews2025/12/31 16:50