Fax machines have been “on the way out” for a long time. Email, cloud storage, digital signatures and secure portals have replaced a lot of the jobs fax once handledFax machines have been “on the way out” for a long time. Email, cloud storage, digital signatures and secure portals have replaced a lot of the jobs fax once handled

Do You Still Need a Fax Machine in a Modern Office?

Fax machines have been “on the way out” for a long time. Email, cloud storage, digital signatures and secure portals have replaced a lot of the jobs fax once handled. And yet, fax machines are still being bought, still being used, and still turning up in offices that otherwise look fairly modern.

The question most people now ask isn’t how to use a fax machine. It’s whether there’s any real reason to keep one at all.

As with most office business technology, the answer depends less on what’s available and more on how the office actually works.

Where fax machines are still used

In many workplaces, fax machines haven’t disappeared so much as slipped into the background. They tend to remain where processes haven’t changed, or where external requirements still exist.

Healthcare is a common example. GP surgeries, clinics and pharmacies often rely on fax for sending referrals or forms because it fits with established systems and compliance rules. The same applies in parts of the legal sector, where fax is still accepted as a formal way of sending documents, often tied to reference details such as a tax number or case identifier.

Local authorities and some government departments also continue to use fax, particularly where older systems are still in place. In those environments, replacing a fax machine isn’t just about buying something new. It often means changing procedures that involve several organisations at once, including external IT services providers.

Fax machines versus email

Email is quicker, cheaper and easier for most day-to-day communication. That’s not really in question. But email isn’t always treated in the same way as a faxed document.

A fax produces a physical output. It arrives at a specific machine, in a specific place, often printed using a thermal printer. For some organisations, that still carries weight, particularly in settings like healthcare, legal offices, and parts of the public sector where audit trails and established processes still matter. It makes it clearer where a document has gone and who is responsible for dealing with it next.

There’s also a practical reason fax is still viewed differently in some organisations. Traditional fax machines send documents over a phone line rather than across a digital network. That means they’re less exposed to some of the risks associated with email systems, such as messages being intercepted, altered, or redirected while in transit.

This doesn’t make fax universally “more secure”, but in environments where data handling rules haven’t changed, the simplicity of a phone-line transmission is still seen as a known quantity.

There are also situations where email simply isn’t practical. Not every external organisation accepts attachments. Some systems block certain file types. Others require documents to be sent in a format that fax already covers without any extra steps, even as fax technology itself has evolved.

Standalone fax machines or multifunction devices

In offices where fax is still used regularly, the discussion is usually about how fax fits into the wider setup, rather than whether it’s needed at all. In some cases, it’s handled through a multifunction printer or newer digital fax services, especially where digital faxing or internet faxing is already in use alongside traditional machines.

Other offices keep a standalone fax machine because it avoids complications. When documents are coming in and out throughout the day, having a dedicated machine can prevent queues, confusion, and someone wondering why the printer has suddenly stopped working.

It tends to come down less to office size and more to how often fax is part of the working day, and whether modern faxing tools are already embedded into daily workflows.

What to consider before getting rid of one

Before removing a fax machine entirely, it’s worth looking at how it’s actually used. In some offices, fax only comes into play once or twice a week, but when it does, it’s usually for something that matters.

It’s also sensible to check whether any external organisations still expect documents to be faxed. Changing that arrangement isn’t always straightforward, especially where compliance or legacy systems are involved.

Moving everything to digital alternatives can make sense, particularly options such as online fax services, fax-to-email services, or cloud-based faxing that connect fax traffic directly to inboxes and cloud services. But it generally works best when everyone involved is ready to make that change at the same time.

Does a modern office still need fax?

In short, many offices don’t. But some still do.

For many businesses, email and digital document handling now cover almost everything. Fax has been replaced entirely by digital fax services and isn’t missed.

But there are still situations where fax sits quietly in the background, used infrequently but expected to work first time when it’s needed. That’s why fax machines haven’t vanished altogether.

They’re no longer everywhere, but they remain in specific environments where processes haven’t fully changed, or where outside organisations still rely on them, even as fax technology continues to move beyond the era of Alexander Graham Bell into more connected systems.

What it comes down to

Fax machines aren’t about nostalgia or refusing to move on.
They’re still around because, in some workplaces, they continue to fit the way information is shared. Whether a modern office needs one usually comes down to how documents actually move in and out of the business. Once that’s clear, the decision tends to make itself.

At Office Stationery, we still see fax machines ordered for specific environments where they continue to serve a clear purpose, alongside online fax services, cloud-based faxing, and other evolving forms of business technology.

Comments
Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0,003469
$0,003469$0,003469
-0,34%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10