Author: Garrett Compiled by: Yuliya, PANews Recently, some analysts have begun comparing Bitcoin's current price movement to that of 2022. While short-term priceAuthor: Garrett Compiled by: Yuliya, PANews Recently, some analysts have begun comparing Bitcoin's current price movement to that of 2022. While short-term price

Stop clinging to outdated methods; the current Bitcoin market is not a repeat of the 2022 bear market.

2026/01/20 19:30

Author: Garrett

Compiled by: Yuliya, PANews

Recently, some analysts have begun comparing Bitcoin's current price movement to that of 2022. While short-term price patterns may appear somewhat similar, such a comparison is utterly absurd in the long run. Whether considering long-term price patterns, the macroeconomic context, or the composition and holdings of investors, the underlying logic has fundamentally changed.

One of the biggest mistakes in analyzing and trading financial markets is focusing solely on short-term, superficial statistical similarities while ignoring long-term, macroeconomic, and fundamental drivers.

Completely opposite macro background

In March 2022, the United States was in a clear cycle of high inflation and interest rate hikes, primarily driven by the following factors:

  • Excess liquidity released during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • The outbreak of the war in Ukraine further fueled inflation.

In that environment, risk-free interest rates were rising, liquidity was being systematically withdrawn, and financial conditions were tightening. Therefore, the primary objective of capital was risk aversion. What we saw in the Bitcoin market was a typical high-level distribution structure within a tightening cycle.

The current macroeconomic environment is exactly the opposite:

  • The conflict in Ukraine is easing (partly due to U.S. efforts to reduce inflation and interest rates).

  • The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the risk-free interest rate in the United States are declining.

  • More importantly, the artificial intelligence (AI) technological revolution has greatly increased the likelihood of the economy entering a long-term downward inflation cycle. Therefore, in a larger cycle, interest rates have already entered a phase of rate cuts.

  • The central bank's liquidity is being reinjected into the financial system.

All of this defines the behavior of capital as "risk preference".

The chart analysis shows a clear negative correlation between Bitcoin prices and year-on-year CPI changes since 2020—Bitcoin tends to fall during periods of rising inflation and rise during periods of falling inflation. With the AI-driven technological revolution, a long-term decline in inflation is highly probable, a view echoed by Elon Musk, thus reinforcing this argument.

Furthermore, since 2020, Bitcoin has shown a strong correlation with the US Liquidity Index (except for a short-term distortion in 2024 caused by ETF inflows). Currently, the US Liquidity Index has broken through its short-term (white line) and long-term (red line) downtrend lines, indicating a new uptrend is on the horizon.

Different technical structures

  • 2021-2022: The market at that time showed a weekly M-top structure, which is usually associated with the top of a long-term market and will suppress prices for a considerable period of time.

  • 2025: The current market performance shows a break below an upward channel on the weekly chart. From a probability perspective, this is more likely a "bear trap," and the price will subsequently rebound back into the channel.

Of course, the possibility of the market evolving into a sustained bear market like that of 2022 cannot be completely ruled out. However, the key point is that the $80,850 to $62,000 range has undergone extensive consolidation and turnover. The previous substantial accumulation process offers a far superior risk-reward ratio for establishing bullish positions: the upside potential significantly outweighs the downside risk.

What conditions are needed to recreate a bear market like the one in 2022?

For a bear market of the magnitude of 2022 to recur, the following indispensable conditions must be met:

  • A new round of inflationary shocks may emerge, or a major geopolitical crisis of similar scale to that of 2022 may erupt.

  • Central banks around the world are restarting interest rate hikes or quantitative tightening (QT).

  • Prices decisively and persistently fell below $80,850.

Before these conditions are met, any claim that a structural bear market has arrived is premature and constitutes subjective speculation rather than objective analysis.

Different investor structures

  • 2020–2022: This was a market dominated by retail investors with limited institutional participation, especially a lack of long-term allocation institutions.

  • 2023 to present: The launch of Bitcoin spot ETFs has introduced structured long-term holders. These institutions have effectively locked up the supply, drastically reduced the speed of token trading, and significantly reduced market volatility.

From both a macroeconomic and quantitative perspective, 2023 marked a structural inflection point for Bitcoin as an asset. Bitcoin's volatility pattern has shifted from the historical 80%–150% to 30%–60%, reflecting a fundamental change in its asset behavior.

Core structural differences (current vs. 2022)

The biggest difference in the structure of Bitcoin investors now (early 2026) compared to 2022 is that the market has shifted from being "retail-dominated and highly leveraged for speculation" to being "institution-dominated and structurally long-term holding".

In 2022, Bitcoin experienced a classic "crypto-native bear market," driven by panic selling by retail investors and a chain reaction of liquidations of leveraged positions. Today, however, Bitcoin's operating environment has entered a more mature institutional era, characterized by:

  • Stable underlying needs.

  • Locked-in supply.

  • Institutional-level volatility.

The following is a core comparison based on on-chain data (such as Glassnode, Chainalysis) and institutional reports (such as Grayscale, Bitwise, State Street) up to mid-January 2026 (when Bitcoin was priced between $90k and $95k).

Dimension

2022 (Bottom of the bear market, approximately $16k-$20k)

Early 2026 (currently, approximately $90k-$95k)

The biggest changes and impacts

Dominant Investor Type

Retail investors + crypto natives (retail investors, leveraged traders)

Institutional + Corporate + Macro Funds (ETFs, Corporate Treasury Funds, Sovereign/Pension Funds)

The market has shifted from being driven by retail investor sentiment to being driven by institutional allocation. Institutional holdings currently account for approximately 24% (compared to less than 5% in 2022).

Retail investors were net sellers.

Institutional/ETF Shares

Very low (no spot ETFs, limited institutional exposure)

The combined assets under management (AUM) of a Bitcoin spot ETF and ETP are > $100-$130 billion, holding approximately 1.3-1.5 million Bitcoins (representing ~6-7% of the circulating supply).

The approval of ETFs in 2024 was a turning point. Net inflows are projected to exceed $25 billion in 2025.

Even during the downturn, institutions provided structural support.

Corporate vault holdings

Very few (early stages of MicroStrategy)

The listed company holds more than 1.3 million Bitcoins (~6-7% of the supply);

MicroStrategy holds over 650,000 Bitcoins, followed closely by Japanese companies such as Metaplanet.

The "MicroStrategy model" is going global. Businesses are shifting from speculation to strategic reserves.

In 2025, he added more than 200,000 Bitcoins to his portfolio.

Retail investor behavior

Panic selling led to a sharp drop in the number of active addresses and a plunge in small transaction volumes.

Retail investors were net sellers (for example, an estimated 247,000 bitcoins were sold in 2025);

Small-scale transactions dropped sharply, but some small investors (less than 1 Bitcoin) accumulated shares at the low point.

Retail investors have either "surrendered" or turned to indirect investment through ETFs. Google Trends activity is low, and small-scale on-chain activity is decreasing.

Long-term holder (LTH) behavior

Large-scale forced/panic distribution led to a sharp drop in LTH supply.

LTH is still being distributed (peaking in late 2025, now slowing down);

Tokens are flowing to institutions/enterprises

2022 was a year of "desperate distribution";

It's now time for "orderly profit-taking by institutions." LTH's weekly realized profits have fallen from a peak of over 100,000 bitcoins to lower levels.

Whales/Large-sized investors

Whales also panic-sold or were liquidated.

"Fish to Shark" (holding 10-1,000 Bitcoins) + whales (>1,000 Bitcoins) are aggressively accumulating (e.g., the heaviest monthly buy since the FTX crash).

Large and medium-sized investors (high-net-worth individuals, trading desks, and institutions) are currently the main buyers;

Glassnode's accumulated score is close to its maximum value.

Exchange reserves and liquidity

High reserves (>3 million Bitcoins) can easily trigger a chain reaction of liquidations.

Reserves have fallen to approximately 2.76 million bitcoins;

Net outflow; more funds are locked in ETFs/corporates

Reduced "hot money" in exchanges → lower risk of leveraged liquidation. Volatility decreases (e.g., from 84% to ~43%).

Overall market stability

High leverage + retail investors → extreme volatility, with drawdowns exceeding -70% multiple times.

Institutional backing + corporate lock-up → Even a -44% drawdown (from the 2025 peak) did not trigger a chain reaction.

2025 will see negative returns, but the structure is resilient. Unlike the "total collapse" of 2022, there is now solid institutional buying support.

Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0.003613
$0.003613$0.003613
-1.44%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37