THE Commission on Audit (CoA) has submitted four more fraud audit reports to the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), uncovering more than P325 millionTHE Commission on Audit (CoA) has submitted four more fraud audit reports to the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), uncovering more than P325 million

CoA flags P325M in missing Bulacan flood structures

THE Commission on Audit (CoA) has submitted four more fraud audit reports to the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), uncovering more than P325 million in Bulacan flood control projects where structures were missing or built outside approved locations.

In a statement dated Jan. 16 and released on Tuesday, the state auditor cited “systemic misuse of public funds” within the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Bulacan 1st District Engineering Office.

The findings pointed to “ghost projects,” unauthorized site relocations and payments for infrastructure that predated contracts.

CoA said DPWH representatives directed inspectors to locations different from approved plans “without any approved revised plans or written authority to justify the relocation,” violating procurement and contract rules.

Auditors used drone surveillance and historical satellite imagery to expose irregularities in contracts awarded to Wawao Builders and Darcy and Anna Builders & Trading across four municipalities from July 2022 to May 2025.

In Malolos City, a P74.1-million riverbank protection project in the village of Babatnin was flagged after satellite data showed the structure existed nearly a year before the contract.

In Hagonoy, a P77.2-million project was declared 100% complete, though the structure was found roughly 694 meters from the approved site. In Guiguinto, a P96.5-million project showed discrepancies in length and cross-sections, which CoA said “seriously undermine the credibility of reported accomplishments and payments made.”

The audits follow an August 2025 directive from CoA Chairman Gamaliel A. Cordoba to address public concerns over ghost projects and corruption in critical infrastructure.

A total of 18 people — including district engineers, project engineers, section chiefs and representatives from the two construction firms — were named as potentially liable and could face graft, malversation and falsification charges.

President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. has yet to decide the future of the ICI, the fact-finding body reviewing the projects, according to Malacañang.

“For now, and as the President has also said, it still depends on the work done, and it needs to be seen how far the ICI has gone in their tasks,” Palace Press Officer Clarissa A. Castro told a news briefing.

The ICI, established through Executive Order No. 94 in September, has only its chairman, Andres B. Reyes, Jr., remaining after two commissioners resigned last year, citing completed work.

Ms. Castro said if the body were dissolved, the Office of the Ombudsman and Department of Justice would continue the investigation.

President Marcos said last week that the commission is “coming toward the end” of its run. He noted that new appointments would depend on whether further work is needed.

The Bulacan flood control scandal, which has drawn public outrage, involves billions of pesos in alleged kickbacks by government officials and contractors.

The climate-vulnerable country has long struggled to protect communities from floods despite repeated infrastructure spending.

Mr. Marcos first flagged the collusion in his July 2025 State of the Nation address and established the ICI to investigate and eventually refer cases to the courts. — Chloe Mari A. Hufana

Market Opportunity
Alliance Games Logo
Alliance Games Price(COA)
$0.002963
$0.002963$0.002963
0.00%
USD
Alliance Games (COA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37