The post Can MOODENG’s leveraged 16% pump break past $0.06? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The memecoin market bounced a little, despite the rest of the marketThe post Can MOODENG’s leveraged 16% pump break past $0.06? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The memecoin market bounced a little, despite the rest of the market

Can MOODENG’s leveraged 16% pump break past $0.06?

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The memecoin market bounced a little, despite the rest of the market still struggling to register any gains over the last 24 hours. MOODENG was one of the few exceptions though, with its gains much more pronounced than the rest. In fact, the memecoin hiked by 16% over the past day.

While volume for the broader sector faded, that of MOODENG rose – A clear divergence. Hence, the question – How did the memecoin outperform the sector, despite having lost most of its market cap?

Leveraged traders fuel MOODENG price gains

The move seemed to have come from the Futures trading pairs. For instance, MOODENG was the top gainer on Binance Futures, confirming that leveraged traders were indeed behind the move.

This trend was also evident on the liquidation map. Binance’s $1.06 million in cumulative long liquidation leverage was a third of the $3.60 million for OKX, Bybit, and Binance combined.

The highest leverage-driven buy was $0.0486 for all exchanges, as per CoinGlass.

Source: CoinGlass

Additionally, the MOODENG liquidity pool on Raydium (RAY) saw a spike in activity. As per Solscan, both total trades and traders rose by 262% to 25,839 and 580, respectively.

The total trading volume on Raydium rose to $4.6 million – About a 2,005% change. Other DEX pools like Meteora and Orca also saw an increase in activity, though not as much.

Source – Solscan

Sentiment was also high, as CoinMarketCap data revealed that it was the trendiest Solana memecoin at press time. It was ranked first, while Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) came fifth.

Source: CoinMarketCap

Can this momentum last from a technical perspective?

Momentum on steroids!

The price charts suggested that MOODENG’s momentum was high, as evidenced by the Stochastic Momentum Index (SMI). The SMI was 41.78 – A sign tha the memecoin had been on a bullish trend for the past two days.

However, the price was trading at a local resistance around $0.0558, alluding to a potential pullback. Price bounced off the 50% retracement level, but it’s unclear if the pullback would be enough to power a break past $0.0558.

Thus, MOODENG could likely drop to the 0.618 retracement level, which was at $0.04757. If this area is filled, a reversal pattern like a bullish engulfing could confirm a shift. Hence, target $0.058, and if broken, MOODENG could push past $0.060.

Source: MOODENG/USDT on TradingView

This did not rule out the chances of the price getting back to where the move was initiated at $0.04136 though. And, why was this so?

Will the leverage-driven pump last?

The move was driven by leverage, and usually, it is not sustainable in the long run.

Looking at data from CoinGlass, the OI-Weighted Funding Rate had flipped back to red after eight hours. This meant that traders were slowly taking profits, explaining why the price was stalling around $0.0540.

Source: CoinGlass

However, this also underlined how a small shift in direction bias for leveraged trading can be influential to price changes. That said, MOODENG looked likely to stall before another rally or continue if more participants, especially spot traders, join the trend.


Final Thoughts

  • MOODENG rallied by more than 16% in 24 hours, driven by leverage traders. 
  • MOODENG’s price rally at risk of collapse after traders withdrew leverage slowly. 
Next: Could PEPE repeat its April 2024 rally? THESE metrics say yes

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/can-moodengs-leveraged-16-pump-break-past-0-06/

Market Opportunity
Moo Deng Logo
Moo Deng Price(MOODENG)
$0.0449
$0.0449$0.0449
-2.96%
USD
Moo Deng (MOODENG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30
Metaplanet raises $1.4B to fuel BTC purchases and U.S. subsidiary launch

Metaplanet raises $1.4B to fuel BTC purchases and U.S. subsidiary launch

Metaplanet Inc. has formalized the subsidiary in Miami, Florida, naming it Metaplanet Income Corp.
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/17 23:34
Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

The post Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This morning, Bitcoin Core developers celebrated improved block reconstruction statistics for node operators while conveniently ignoring the reason for these statistics — the downward trend in fees for Bitcoin’s security budget. Reacting with heart emojis and thumbs up to a green chart showing over 80% “successful compact block reconstructions without any requested transactions,” they conveniently omitted red trend lines of the fees that Bitcoin users pay for mining security which powered those green statistics. Block reconstructions occur when a node requests additional information about transactions within a compact block. Although compact blocks allow nodes to quickly relay valid bundles of transactions across the internet, the more frequently that nodes can reconstruct without extra, cumbersome transaction requests from their peers is a positive trend. Because so many nodes switched over in August to relay transactions bidding 0.1 sat/vB across their mempools, nodes now have to request less transaction data to reconstruct blocks containing sub-1 sat/vB transactions. After nodes switched over in August to accept and relay pending transactions bidding less than 1 sat/vB, disparate mempools became harmonized as most nodes had a better view of which transactions would likely join upcoming blocks. As a result, block reconstruction times improved, as nodes needed less information about these sub-1 sat/vB transactions. In July, several miners admitted that user demand for Bitcoin blockspace had persisted at such a low that they were willing to accept transaction fees of just 0.1 satoshi per virtual byte — 90% lower than their prior 1 sat/vB minimum. With so many blocks partially empty, they succumbed to the temptation to accept at least something — even 1 billionth of one bitcoin (BTC) — rather than $0 to fill up some of the excess blockspace. Read more: Bitcoin’s transaction fees have fallen to a multi-year low Green stats for block reconstruction after transaction fees crash After…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:07