The post Bitcoin volatility rises as IBIT options concentrate risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Leveraged derivatives are driving Bitcoin volatility, challengingThe post Bitcoin volatility rises as IBIT options concentrate risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Leveraged derivatives are driving Bitcoin volatility, challenging

Bitcoin volatility rises as IBIT options concentrate risk

Leveraged derivatives are driving Bitcoin volatility, challenging its narrative

Leveraged options and perpetual swaps can turbocharge Bitcoin’s price moves by forcing hedging, margin calls, and deleveraging when markets gap. That mechanical flow can overwhelm spot demand or ETF-related buying and selling.

As reported by Youtocoin, Robert Mitchnick framed this as a narrative problem: heavy leveraged speculation makes Bitcoin trade more like a “leveraged Nasdaq” than digital gold. The same report noted IBIT’s redemptions were roughly 0.2% during a chaotic week, implying derivatives, not ETF outflows, were the primary shock transmitters.

Why this matters for digital-gold adoption and institutions

For allocators pursuing a “digital-gold” role, derivative-driven swings can inflate tracking error, Value-at-Risk, and stress losses versus portfolio hedging goals. That raises hurdles for committees that require stable defensive characteristics and predictable liquidity.

As reported by Simply Wall St, concentration around a single access vehicle and its options activity has prompted discussion of systemic risk. Their analysis suggests ETF-linked derivatives behavior could attract heightened regulatory attention if it destabilizes the underlying market or investor outcomes.

“Leveraged volatility is threatening the Bitcoin narrative,” said Robert Mitchnick, Head of digital assets.

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

In the recent stress episode, industry remarks pointed to minimal primary-market ETF redemptions while derivatives positioning magnified intraday and cross-venue price swings. Forced de-risking through options hedging and leverage unwind likely intensified the move.

according to Whale Alert’s summary of analyst Parker White, a spike in IBIT options volume, combined with a leveraged short-volatility cover at a Hong Kong hedge fund, coincided with a drop from about $70,000 to $63,000, illustrating this transmission.

At the time of this writing, the figures indicate Bitcoin near $69,049 with very high short-term volatility around 12.37% and a neutral RSI reading near 38.69, offering context for recent swings.

IBIT and BlackRock: case study and risk management checklist

IBIT options activity can magnify moves without large redemptions

ETF options can generate dealer hedging that impacts spot and futures even when primary-market creations or redemptions are small. When volatility spikes, that hedging can accelerate both downside and upside moves.

Institutional controls: hedging, position limits, liquidity discipline

Institutions can mitigate spillovers by enforcing position and concentration limits, pre-trade risk checks, and hard leverage caps. Disciplined collateral, stress testing, and liquidity buffers help contain forced unwinds during volatility shocks.

FAQ about leveraged derivatives

Are Bitcoin price swings being driven more by derivatives than by ETF redemptions and spot flows?

Yes. Recent remarks and analyses indicate derivatives drove the turbulence while ETF redemptions were minimal during stress.

How could IBIT options activity and concentrated flows impact Bitcoin’s volatility?

Concentrated options flows can force dealer hedging, transmitting pressure into spot and futures. This can magnify both rallies and selloffs, even without large ETF redemptions.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/bitcoin-volatility-rises-as-ibit-options-concentrate-risk/

Market Opportunity
NEAR Logo
NEAR Price(NEAR)
$1.037
$1.037$1.037
-2.00%
USD
NEAR (NEAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Peso likely range-bound as market eyes BSP meet

Peso likely range-bound as market eyes BSP meet

THE PESO may move sideways against the dollar this week before an expected rate cut by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and following the release of softer
Share
Bworldonline2026/02/16 00:02
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12