The post Satoshi-era whale converts 35,991 BTC into 886,371 ETH appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A wallet labeled as “Satoshi‑era” executed a massive swap: 35,991 BTC, valued at approximately 4.04 billion dollars according to CoinMarketCap, were exchanged for 886,371 ETH, estimated around 4.07 billion dollars based on CoinMarketCap. The operation, monitored on-chain by analysis tools like Glassnode, has reignited attention on liquidity, accumulation, and potential domino effects on the price of Ethereum. External analyses and market research indicate how movements of institutional capital and from large wallets can have pronounced impacts on the depth of order books in the short term Chainalysis, while on-chain circulating supply data confirm the proportions indicated on Etherscan Etherscan. According to data collected by our editorial team, verified through Glassnode and Etherscan at 23:45 CEST on September 15, 2025, the swap is attributable to net flows that have traversed multiple liquidity pools; market analysts observe consistent signals of capital reallocation from Bitcoin to Ethereum. Key Points (in brief) BTC sold: 35.991 BTC (≈ 4.04 billion USD at the time of recording, data from CoinMarketCap) ETH received: 886.371 ETH (≈ 4.07 billion USD at the time of recording, data from CoinMarketCap) Time window: September 15, 2025 (CEST), spot price referred to 11:45 PM CEST Relative impact: 886,371 ETH represent about 0.74% of the circulating supply of Ethereum, estimated at 120,000,000 ETH (on-chain data as of 09/15/2025 from Etherscan), while 35,991 BTC correspond to about 0.18% of the Bitcoin supply, with an estimated circulation of ~19.65 million units (data from CoinMarketCap/Etherscan); Related flows: recent BTC movements to hot wallets suggest the possibility of further ETH purchases; for more insights on the concept of hot wallets, see our internal guide Hot wallet (glossary). What Happened (and Why It Matters) According to on-chain monitoring, the wallet in question has converted a significant portion of BTC into ETH, with a value discrepancy in line with… The post Satoshi-era whale converts 35,991 BTC into 886,371 ETH appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A wallet labeled as “Satoshi‑era” executed a massive swap: 35,991 BTC, valued at approximately 4.04 billion dollars according to CoinMarketCap, were exchanged for 886,371 ETH, estimated around 4.07 billion dollars based on CoinMarketCap. The operation, monitored on-chain by analysis tools like Glassnode, has reignited attention on liquidity, accumulation, and potential domino effects on the price of Ethereum. External analyses and market research indicate how movements of institutional capital and from large wallets can have pronounced impacts on the depth of order books in the short term Chainalysis, while on-chain circulating supply data confirm the proportions indicated on Etherscan Etherscan. According to data collected by our editorial team, verified through Glassnode and Etherscan at 23:45 CEST on September 15, 2025, the swap is attributable to net flows that have traversed multiple liquidity pools; market analysts observe consistent signals of capital reallocation from Bitcoin to Ethereum. Key Points (in brief) BTC sold: 35.991 BTC (≈ 4.04 billion USD at the time of recording, data from CoinMarketCap) ETH received: 886.371 ETH (≈ 4.07 billion USD at the time of recording, data from CoinMarketCap) Time window: September 15, 2025 (CEST), spot price referred to 11:45 PM CEST Relative impact: 886,371 ETH represent about 0.74% of the circulating supply of Ethereum, estimated at 120,000,000 ETH (on-chain data as of 09/15/2025 from Etherscan), while 35,991 BTC correspond to about 0.18% of the Bitcoin supply, with an estimated circulation of ~19.65 million units (data from CoinMarketCap/Etherscan); Related flows: recent BTC movements to hot wallets suggest the possibility of further ETH purchases; for more insights on the concept of hot wallets, see our internal guide Hot wallet (glossary). What Happened (and Why It Matters) According to on-chain monitoring, the wallet in question has converted a significant portion of BTC into ETH, with a value discrepancy in line with…

Satoshi-era whale converts 35,991 BTC into 886,371 ETH

A wallet labeled as “Satoshi‑era” executed a massive swap: 35,991 BTC, valued at approximately 4.04 billion dollars according to CoinMarketCap, were exchanged for 886,371 ETH, estimated around 4.07 billion dollars based on CoinMarketCap.

The operation, monitored on-chain by analysis tools like Glassnode, has reignited attention on liquidity, accumulation, and potential domino effects on the price of Ethereum.

External analyses and market research indicate how movements of institutional capital and from large wallets can have pronounced impacts on the depth of order books in the short term Chainalysis, while on-chain circulating supply data confirm the proportions indicated on Etherscan Etherscan.

According to data collected by our editorial team, verified through Glassnode and Etherscan at 23:45 CEST on September 15, 2025, the swap is attributable to net flows that have traversed multiple liquidity pools; market analysts observe consistent signals of capital reallocation from Bitcoin to Ethereum.

Key Points (in brief)

  • BTC sold: 35.991 BTC (≈ 4.04 billion USD at the time of recording, data from CoinMarketCap)
  • ETH received: 886.371 ETH (≈ 4.07 billion USD at the time of recording, data from CoinMarketCap)
  • Time window: September 15, 2025 (CEST), spot price referred to 11:45 PM CEST
  • Relative impact: 886,371 ETH represent about 0.74% of the circulating supply of Ethereum, estimated at 120,000,000 ETH (on-chain data as of 09/15/2025 from Etherscan), while 35,991 BTC correspond to about 0.18% of the Bitcoin supply, with an estimated circulation of ~19.65 million units (data from CoinMarketCap/Etherscan);
  • Related flows: recent BTC movements to hot wallets suggest the possibility of further ETH purchases; for more insights on the concept of hot wallets, see our internal guide Hot wallet (glossary).

What Happened (and Why It Matters)

According to on-chain monitoring, the wallet in question has converted a significant portion of BTC into ETH, with a value discrepancy in line with normal market slippage.

The transaction, valued at around 4 billion dollars, impacts the available liquidity and fuels the narrative of a rotation from Bitcoin to Ethereum in the short term (Chainalysis).

That said, the real impact will depend on the persistence of the flows and the market’s ability to absorb them without excessive friction.

The picture becomes more significant considering the accumulation trend by large-sized wallets: addresses holding between 10K and 100K ETH are on the rise, with levels close to recent highs recorded on analysis dashboards like Glassnode and Santiment.

In this context, signals of further concentration can influence expectations and tactical positioning; for historical data and trends on large holders, see our in-depth analysis Whales ETH: movements and trends.

Why such an operation can move ETH

  • Spot demand: such a large-scale swap increases the buying pressure on ETH and can reduce, even if only temporarily, the available supply.
  • Signal of confidence: the allocation towards ETH by a high-caliber investor can attract additional speculative flows.
  • News effect: high media coverage generates additional interest and potentially accentuates volatility.

Market Reaction: Accumulation and Psychology

Wallets containing between 10K and 100K ETH are increasing their positions, with levels that various trackers indicate as nearing records, contributing to strengthening the perceived momentum.

However, the continuity of flows and the depth of the order books on exchanges will determine the evolution of the trend. It should be noted that the psychological component, during rally phases, tends to emphasize directional movements.

Q3 2025: where does this movement stand

  • ETH Performance in Q3 2025: +87.66% (so far, data reported by market observers like CoinMarketCap)
  • Historical Average Q3 (ETH): +9.55% (historical data published by various market dashboards)
  • Comparison: The rallies of Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 were less amplified compared to the current progression, highlighting an exceptional performance for the current quarter.

In this context, out-of-scale operations like the one observed can act as a catalyst, consolidating an already favorable sentiment for Ethereum. Yet, the elasticity of liquidity and potential profit-taking remain crucial variables for the trajectory of the quarter.

Technical Indicators: Operational Summary

At the time of reporting, Ethereum is trading at approximately 4,663 USD, remaining above the technical support area of 4,600 USD (CoinGecko as a reference for the spot price). The technical tools indicate:

  • RSI (relative strength index): in the area of positive momentum, indicating an active trend without overbought conditions.
  • MACD (moving average convergence/divergence): the MACD line remains above the signal, although the histogram shows signs of a slowdown in momentum.
  • EMA at 50, 100, and 200 days: the price is positioned above these averages, indicating progressive technical supports.
  • Volume: 13.770 (the unit of this data – e.g., thousands of contracts or transactions – is yet to be confirmed, therefore it should be interpreted with caution in historical comparisons).

In practical terms, as long as Ethereum maintains closures above these dynamic supports and no marked bearish divergences appear on RSI and MACD, the outlook remains constructive; a drop below the 4,600–4,550 USD area could trigger deeper rebalancing. That said, intraday volatility can remain high in the presence of news or abnormal volumes.

Implications of Large BTC→ETH Transfers

  • Supply/DEMAND: the swap has increased the spot demand for ETH, potentially draining liquidity from the sell side.
  • Media coverage: the high visibility of the trade encourages potential speculative entries and further accumulation.
  • Concentration risk: if the operator were to reverse course, the concentration of capital could amplify volatility.

Quick FAQ

Is ETH above 4,600 USD a reliable support?

The area around 4,600 USD represents an important technical support: maintaining the price above this level, along with the position above the main EMAs and the absence of bearish divergences, strengthens the outlook.

In an optimistic scenario, we could see a consolidation above 4,600–4,700 USD; in a negative scenario, losing this level could push the price to test lower moving averages and increase volatility.

What are the risks associated with concentration in a single “whale”?

The concentration of capital in a single operator amplifies the potential impact of the trade: a rapid distribution of the position could trigger cascading sales.

It is therefore essential to monitor the flows to the exchanges and observe any fragmentations into different addresses. For operational guidance on how to monitor the flows, see our article on how to read on-chain data On-chain Monitoring: Practical Guide.

Did the transaction occur entirely on-chain or does it include an OTC component?

The full details have not yet been confirmed. The swap is traceable on-chain, but it is possible that a portion was handled via OTC desks to limit the impact on the exchange order book. The transaction identifiers are currently being verified.

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2025/09/15/satoshi-era-whale-converts-35991-btc-into-886371-eth-approximately-4-billion-dollar-operation-shakes-the-market/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$89,342.96
$89,342.96$89,342.96
-1.47%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Seeker (SKR) will soon be listed on Bybit Spot, Alpha, and Byreal.

Seeker (SKR) will soon be listed on Bybit Spot, Alpha, and Byreal.

PANews reported on January 21 that Bybit will launch Seeker (SKR) on its spot, Alpha, and Byreal platforms. Users can quickly trade without setting up a separate
Share
PANews2026/01/21 08:20
Perpetual DEX in testing with cross‑chain liquidity and ADL

Perpetual DEX in testing with cross‑chain liquidity and ADL

The post Perpetual DEX in testing with cross‑chain liquidity and ADL appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sunperp, a new perpetual DEX being tested on the Tron blockchain, promises millisecond executions, cross-chain liquidity aggregation, and an integrated auto-deleveraging (ADL) system. Justin Sun reshared the announcement on X, inviting users to try it and highlighting dedicated incentives, while numerous economic details and operational metrics remain to be confirmed. According to the data collected by on-chain analysts and industry reports, in May 2025 TRON hosted over 75 billion USDT, with the network recording over 8.3 million daily transactions and approximately 306 million active accounts, a context that justifies the interest in USDT-collateralized derivatives. Market analysts following perpetual DEX also note that the massive availability of USDT on TRON facilitates cross-chain arbitrage operations and reduces costs for market makers. What is Sunperp and what it brings differently to Tron Sunperp is a platform perp DEX that uses USDT as collateral, with profits and losses calculated in USDT. The architecture separates matching, executed off-chain to maximize speed, from settlement, recorded on-chain to ensure transparency of trading results. In this context, the debut announcement was originally reported by Jamie Redman; the team also states that, while in the testing phase, the core contracts are non-upgradable. Main Technical Features Order types: market, limit (with FOK – Fill-or-Kill, GTC – Good-Till-Cancelled, and IOC – Immediate-or-Cancel modes), post-only orders, plan orders, trailing, and TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price). Use of multi-source oracles to determine the mark price employed in the calculation of profits and liquidations. Primary collateral: USDT, with P&L calculated in the same currency. Core contracts declared non-upgradable in an environment still in testing. Cross-chain liquidity: less slippage and tighter spreads The protocol claims to aggregate liquidity flows from various networks in order to increase market depth and improve order execution, thereby reducing slippage and spreads in large-size trades. However, the actual effect will depend…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/22 17:20
Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

BitcoinWorld Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future In the dynamic world of decentralized computing, exciting developments are constantly shaping the future. Today, all eyes are on Akash Network, the innovative supercloud project, as it proposes a significant change to its tokenomics. This move aims to strengthen the value of its native token, AKT, and further solidify its position in the competitive blockchain space. The community is buzzing about a newly submitted governance proposal that could introduce a game-changing Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) model. What is the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) for Akash Network? The core of this proposal revolves around a concept called Burn Mint Equilibrium, or BME. Essentially, this model is designed to create a balance in the token’s circulating supply by systematically removing a portion of tokens from existence. For Akash Network, this means burning an amount of AKT that is equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by network users. Fee Conversion: When users pay for cloud services on the Akash Network, these fees are typically collected in various cryptocurrencies or stablecoins. AKT Equivalence: The proposal suggests converting the U.S. dollar value of these collected fees into an equivalent amount of AKT. Token Burn: This calculated amount of AKT would then be permanently removed from circulation, or ‘burned’. This mechanism creates a direct link between network utility and token supply reduction. As more users utilize the decentralized supercloud, more AKT will be burned, potentially impacting the token’s scarcity and value. Why is This Proposal Crucial for AKT Holders? For anyone holding AKT, or considering investing in the Akash Network ecosystem, this proposal carries significant weight. Token burning mechanisms are often viewed as a positive development because they can lead to increased scarcity. When supply decreases while demand remains constant or grows, the price per unit tends to increase. Here are some key benefits: Increased Scarcity: Burning tokens reduces the total circulating supply of AKT. This makes each remaining token potentially more valuable over time. Demand-Supply Dynamics: The BME model directly ties the burning of AKT to network usage. Higher adoption of the Akash Network supercloud translates into more fees, and thus more AKT burned. Long-Term Value Proposition: By creating a deflationary pressure, the proposal aims to enhance AKT’s long-term value, making it a more attractive asset for investors and long-term holders. This strategic move demonstrates a commitment from the Akash Network community to optimize its tokenomics for sustainable growth and value appreciation. How Does BME Impact the Decentralized Supercloud Mission? Beyond token value, the BME proposal aligns perfectly with the broader mission of the Akash Network. As a decentralized supercloud, Akash provides a marketplace for cloud computing resources, allowing users to deploy applications faster, more efficiently, and at a lower cost than traditional providers. The BME model reinforces this utility. Consider these impacts: Network Health: A stronger AKT token can incentivize more validators and providers to secure and contribute resources to the network, improving its overall health and resilience. Ecosystem Growth: Enhanced token value can attract more developers and projects to build on the Akash Network, fostering a vibrant and diverse ecosystem. User Incentive: While users pay fees, the potential appreciation of AKT could indirectly benefit those who hold the token, creating a circular economy within the supercloud. This proposal is not just about burning tokens; it’s about building a more robust, self-sustaining, and economically sound decentralized cloud infrastructure for the future. What Are the Next Steps for the Akash Network Community? As a governance proposal, the BME model will now undergo a period of community discussion and voting. This is a crucial phase where AKT holders and network participants can voice their opinions, debate the merits, and ultimately decide on the future direction of the project. Transparency and community engagement are hallmarks of decentralized projects like Akash Network. Challenges and Considerations: Implementation Complexity: Ensuring the burning mechanism is technically sound and transparent will be vital. Community Consensus: Achieving broad agreement within the diverse Akash Network community is key for successful adoption. The outcome of this vote will significantly shape the tokenomics and economic model of the Akash Network, influencing its trajectory in the rapidly evolving decentralized cloud landscape. The proposal to introduce a Burn Mint Equilibrium model represents a bold and strategic step for Akash Network. By directly linking network usage to token scarcity, the project aims to create a more resilient and valuable AKT token, ultimately strengthening its position as a leading decentralized supercloud provider. This move underscores the project’s commitment to innovative tokenomics and sustainable growth, promising an exciting future for both users and investors in the Akash Network ecosystem. It’s a clear signal that Akash is actively working to enhance its value proposition and maintain its competitive edge in the decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is the main goal of the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) proposal for Akash Network? The primary goal is to adjust the circulating supply of AKT tokens by burning a portion of network fees, thereby creating deflationary pressure and potentially enhancing the token’s long-term value and scarcity. 2. How will the amount of AKT to be burned be determined? The proposal suggests burning an amount of AKT equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by users on the Akash Network for cloud services. 3. What are the potential benefits for AKT token holders? Token holders could benefit from increased scarcity of AKT, which may lead to higher demand and appreciation in value over time, especially as network usage grows. 4. How does this proposal relate to the overall mission of Akash Network? The BME model reinforces the Akash Network‘s mission by creating a stronger, more economically robust ecosystem. A healthier token incentivizes network participants, fostering growth and stability for the decentralized supercloud. 5. What is the next step for this governance proposal? The proposal will undergo a period of community discussion and voting by AKT token holders. The community’s decision will determine if the BME model is implemented on the Akash Network. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your support helps us bring more valuable insights into the world of decentralized technology. Stay informed and help spread the word about the exciting developments happening within Akash Network. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized cloud solutions price action. This post Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/22 21:35