The post Supreme Court Hears Campaign Finance Case Today—Here’s How It Could Impact Big-Money Donors appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will consider Tuesday whether to get rid of limits on how much political parties can spend coordinating with candidates, hearing a case brought by Republican candidates including Vice President J.D. Vance and potentially paving the way for wealthy donors to spend thousands more directly supporting candidates’ campaigns. Vice President JD Vance participates in a fireside chat at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on November 20 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), a case brought by Republican campaign committees, Vice President J.D. Vance—from his time as a senator—and former Rep. Steven Joseph Chabot, R-Ohio. The case challenges a longstanding rule that limits how much political parties can spend coordinating directly with candidates, meaning payments for goods and services that directly benefit a candidate’s campaign. In 2025, those limits range from $63,600 for House races for states with more than one congressional district, to $3,946,100 for Senate races in the most populous states, and parties’ coordinated spending was capped at $32,392,200 in the 2024 presidential election. The Republicans challenging the limits argue that the cap violates the First Amendment and doesn’t work as a deterrent to bribery or “quid pro quo” schemes, because other rules that prevent earmarking donations for specific purposes make it “implausible” that a donor would try to bribe a candidate by donating to a political party. The FEC initially defended the limits under the Biden administration, but the Trump administration switched the government’s position and said it thinks the limits should be struck down, so the court appointed a separate lawyer to argue in favor of keeping the policy. What To Watch For The court will hear oral arguments Tuesday and issue a ruling at… The post Supreme Court Hears Campaign Finance Case Today—Here’s How It Could Impact Big-Money Donors appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will consider Tuesday whether to get rid of limits on how much political parties can spend coordinating with candidates, hearing a case brought by Republican candidates including Vice President J.D. Vance and potentially paving the way for wealthy donors to spend thousands more directly supporting candidates’ campaigns. Vice President JD Vance participates in a fireside chat at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on November 20 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), a case brought by Republican campaign committees, Vice President J.D. Vance—from his time as a senator—and former Rep. Steven Joseph Chabot, R-Ohio. The case challenges a longstanding rule that limits how much political parties can spend coordinating directly with candidates, meaning payments for goods and services that directly benefit a candidate’s campaign. In 2025, those limits range from $63,600 for House races for states with more than one congressional district, to $3,946,100 for Senate races in the most populous states, and parties’ coordinated spending was capped at $32,392,200 in the 2024 presidential election. The Republicans challenging the limits argue that the cap violates the First Amendment and doesn’t work as a deterrent to bribery or “quid pro quo” schemes, because other rules that prevent earmarking donations for specific purposes make it “implausible” that a donor would try to bribe a candidate by donating to a political party. The FEC initially defended the limits under the Biden administration, but the Trump administration switched the government’s position and said it thinks the limits should be struck down, so the court appointed a separate lawyer to argue in favor of keeping the policy. What To Watch For The court will hear oral arguments Tuesday and issue a ruling at…

Supreme Court Hears Campaign Finance Case Today—Here’s How It Could Impact Big-Money Donors

2025/12/10 00:27

Topline

The Supreme Court will consider Tuesday whether to get rid of limits on how much political parties can spend coordinating with candidates, hearing a case brought by Republican candidates including Vice President J.D. Vance and potentially paving the way for wealthy donors to spend thousands more directly supporting candidates’ campaigns.

Vice President JD Vance participates in a fireside chat at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on November 20 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images

Key Facts

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), a case brought by Republican campaign committees, Vice President J.D. Vance—from his time as a senator—and former Rep. Steven Joseph Chabot, R-Ohio.

The case challenges a longstanding rule that limits how much political parties can spend coordinating directly with candidates, meaning payments for goods and services that directly benefit a candidate’s campaign.

In 2025, those limits range from $63,600 for House races for states with more than one congressional district, to $3,946,100 for Senate races in the most populous states, and parties’ coordinated spending was capped at $32,392,200 in the 2024 presidential election.

The Republicans challenging the limits argue that the cap violates the First Amendment and doesn’t work as a deterrent to bribery or “quid pro quo” schemes, because other rules that prevent earmarking donations for specific purposes make it “implausible” that a donor would try to bribe a candidate by donating to a political party.

The FEC initially defended the limits under the Biden administration, but the Trump administration switched the government’s position and said it thinks the limits should be struck down, so the court appointed a separate lawyer to argue in favor of keeping the policy.

What To Watch For

The court will hear oral arguments Tuesday and issue a ruling at some point during the coming months. A decision will come out before the court’s term ends in late June 2026, so whatever the court decides will affect fundraising in the 2026 midterm elections.

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/09/supreme-court-could-soon-abolish-another-limit-on-big-money-political-donations-what-to-know-as-case-heard-today/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14