Crypto Companies Should Be Treated Equally Under Federal Banking Laws, Says OCC Jonathan Gould, head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), emphasized that crypto firms seeking a US federal bank charter should be subject to the same regulatory standards as traditional financial institutions. Speaking at a recent blockchain conference, Gould highlighted [...]Crypto Companies Should Be Treated Equally Under Federal Banking Laws, Says OCC Jonathan Gould, head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), emphasized that crypto firms seeking a US federal bank charter should be subject to the same regulatory standards as traditional financial institutions. Speaking at a recent blockchain conference, Gould highlighted [...]

OCC Boss: No Justification for Differential Treatment of Crypto

2025/12/09 11:28
Occ Boss: No Justification For Differential Treatment Of Crypto

Crypto Companies Should Be Treated Equally Under Federal Banking Laws, Says OCC

Jonathan Gould, head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), emphasized that crypto firms seeking a US federal bank charter should be subject to the same regulatory standards as traditional financial institutions. Speaking at a recent blockchain conference, Gould highlighted that the activities involved in custody and safekeeping of digital assets have been electronically managed for decades, making it unjustifiable to treat digital assets differently from conventional banking services.

Key Takeaways

  • Gould advocates for equal treatment of crypto companies under banking regulations.
  • The OCC recognizes digital assets’ longstanding electronic custody services.
  • Only two crypto-focused banks—Anchorage Digital and Erebor—hold OCC charters.
  • The regulator has seen increasing applications from entities involved in innovative digital asset activities.

Tickers mentioned: none

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Neutral. The comments reflect a balanced stance aiming to integrate crypto into existing financial frameworks without immediate regulatory upheaval.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The regulatory landscape remains dynamic as authorities seek an appropriate balance between innovation and oversight.

Market context: The growing interest from crypto firms in establishing federally regulated banks indicates mainstream acceptance, amid ongoing regulatory discussions.

Regulatory Perspective on Crypto Banking

Gould reaffirmed that the OCC considers the evolution of banking—from the telegraph to blockchain—as a natural progression. He mentioned that 14 applications to establish new banks, including those engaged in digital assets, have been received so far this year, almost matching the total received over the past four years. This surge underscores the industry’s drive toward official recognition and safe regulatory pathways.

“Chartering helps ensure that the banking system keeps pace with financial innovation and supports our modern economy,” Gould stated. “Entities involved with digital assets should have a clear pathway to become federally supervised banks.”

Addressing Industry Concerns

Despite some banking and trade group concerns over OCC oversight of crypto-focused banks, Gould dismissed fears that increased regulation might hinder innovation. He highlighted that the OCC has years of supervisory experience with crypto-native national trust banks, including Anchorage Digital, which has held a charter since 2021, and Erebor, which received a preliminary banking charter in October.

Gould emphasized that ongoing discussions and daily interactions with existing banks demonstrate the OCC’s openness to innovative banking initiatives. “This ongoing dialogue reinforces our confidence in the OCC’s ability to oversee both new entrants and expanded activities within the banking sector fairly and effectively,” he concluded.

This article was originally published as OCC Boss: No Justification for Differential Treatment of Crypto on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The U.S. OCC has warned Wall Street about the "de-banking" of industries such as digital assets, calling such practices "illegal."

The U.S. OCC has warned Wall Street about the "de-banking" of industries such as digital assets, calling such practices "illegal."

PANews reported on December 11th, citing CoinDesk, that President Trump's actions against the "debanking" of controversial industries such as digital assets have prompted the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to release a new report. The report further confirms past practices and warns that banks suspected of involvement could face penalties. This brief OCC report reviewed nine of the largest national banks in the United States, concluding that "between 2020 and 2023, these banks developed public and private policies that restricted certain industries from accessing banking services, including requiring escalating reviews and approvals before providing financial services." The report states that some large banks set higher barriers to entry for controversial or environmentally sensitive businesses, or activities that contradict the banks' own values. Financial giants such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citigroup are highlighted, with links to their past public policies, particularly those concerning environmental issues. The report states, "The OCC intends to pursue accountability for any illegal 'debanking' activities by these banks, including referring related cases to the Attorney General." However, it remains unclear which specific laws these activities may have violated.
Share
PANews2025/12/11 09:04