When the "Fear & Greed Index" remains in an unsettlingly low range for an extended period, the market is often shrouded in fear and uncertainty. With your portfolio in disarray and news headlines filled with doomsday prophecies, your instincts drive you to flee the market. But history records different stories. Those moments when panic reaches its peak and everyone surrenders can become opportunities for a few disciplined investors to create wealth. This article will focus on whether contrarian investment strategies are worth considering in the current market environment. 1. Market Sentiment Benchmark Market movements, especially in highly volatile markets like cryptocurrencies, are not solely driven by fundamentals and balance sheets. Participant psychology, namely the emotions of holders, buyers, or panic sellers, is equally important. "Market sentiment" essentially refers to the overall mindset of investors regarding a particular asset at any given moment. The Cryptocurrency Fear & Greed Index is a quantitative tool for measuring this elusive sentiment. The index integrates multiple data points, including price volatility, market momentum, social media activity, investor sentiment surveys, Bitcoin’s dominance over altcoins, and broader market trends. As is often the case, the greatest utility of this tool is often found in extreme indices. This index acts as a contrarian indicator, meaning that its signals are most valuable when market sentiment is highly convergent and reaches its extreme. Whether the emotional balance tilts extremely towards fear or greed, it may be a sign to investors: It's time to pay attention to the market. 2. Content measured by the index It should be clearly pointed out that the Fear & Greed Index measures current sentiment, not future prices. It is not a prediction of Bitcoin's price movement next week or next month. This index constructs a snapshot of the current market by aggregating data from multiple sources. With the help of sentiment analysis and data aggregation, it attempts to transform various market indicators into a single, readable value. Its function is to provide contextual references for decision-making, rather than to give simple buy or sell instructions. 3. Opportunity or trap? When the index is in the "extreme fear" zone (usually below 25), it signifies that market panic has reached its peak. Investors are now surrendering, and the sell-off seems endless. This also indicates that the market is oversold due to sentiment rather than fundamental factors, which may create real pricing failure opportunities for investors who dare to face their fears. That said, market sentiment could remain in the "fear" zone for weeks or even months. Prices can often fall to unexpectedly low levels. However, just as this index does not require investors to surrender immediately, it is also not a clear-cut buy signal. 4. What is a strategic opportunity? When the "extreme fear" index occurs simultaneously with certain other conditions, your buying logic will be significantly strengthened. Please pay attention to: A sharp price drop accompanied by high trading volume, or a slow, gradual decline, often reflects a continued deterioration in fundamentals, while a sudden plunge is more likely to stem from panic selling. Examining whether negative media coverage has reached its peak, obscuring rational analysis and amplifying emotional narratives. Is there widespread despair on social media? When platforms like X and Reddit are flooded with surrender posts, market sentiment may have bottomed out. Most importantly, analyze whether there are any obvious, entirely new, catastrophic fundamental factors. If no core protocol fails and no new survivability threats emerge, then the current fears may be out of touch with reality. In this regard, on-chain metrics can boost confidence at this moment. Looking at MVRV Z-Score or exchange net inflow data can help confirm that the divergence between sentiment and price is real. The focus should be on the divergence itself, namely the gap between market sentiment and the underlying reality. 5. Fear or rationality To reiterate, not every instance of extreme fear represents an opportunity. Sometimes, fear is indeed well-founded. Imagine a long and difficult bear market. There will be no dramatic surrender in the market; instead, prices will slowly erode, attention will fade, and fundamentals will quietly deteriorate. Or consider those black swan events whose systemic impact has not yet been eliminated. Fear is a reasonable reaction when major exchanges crash and risks are unclear, or when the protocol itself suffers a fundamental malfunction. The key difference here lies in the nature of the emotion itself. Panic selling driven by sentiment but with sound fundamentals presents a potential opportunity. Fear stemming from systemic problems leading to a genuine loss of confidence is a completely different matter. Being able to distinguish between these two scenarios is the essential difference between disciplined contrarian investing and blindly "catching a falling knife." 6. Investor Operation Strategies Knowing what to observe is important, but knowing how to act is even more crucial. Let's move from theory to practice and explore some specific methods to strengthen discipline and eliminate emotional interference in decision-making. Dollar-cost averaging For most investors facing a fearful market, dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is the preferred strategy. By automatically executing purchases periodically, you invest a fixed amount regardless of price levels, completely unaffected by emotions. In a bear market, you can systematically accumulate assets throughout the bottom range without needing to precisely predict the lowest point. During temporary pullbacks, you stick to your strategy and continue accumulating while others panic. Building warehouses in batches If you have a lump sum of money that you can invest at any time, rather than a regular cash flow, you may consider a phased investment strategy. Instead of investing all your funds at once, divide them into several portions (e.g., 3 to 5). Then, you can use specific fear and greed thresholds as trigger points. For example: When the index falls to 20, invest the first portion; when it falls to 15, invest the second portion; when it falls to 10, invest the third portion. The remaining portion is kept as a reserve for use if the market deteriorates further, or deployed as appropriate based on subsequent developments. This transforms the index from an abstract indicator into a concrete action trigger. It provides a systematic alternative to the all-or-nothing gambling behavior of "precise bottom-fishing." 7. Risk Management in Adversity Regardless of whether a bear market has truly arrived, any funds deployed during periods of extreme fear must be capital that you can withstand losses for several years. Bitcoin's high volatility means that your "extreme fear" buy-in position could fall another 30% before a recovery even begins. To manage this risk, there are several key principles to follow. Position management and portfolio discipline "Fear-driven buying" should still be placed within a pre-defined asset allocation framework. A reasonable approach is that, in any single purchase, the funds used for speculative accumulation should not exceed 5% to 10% of your total risk capital. This ensures that even if you time your judgment too early and prices continue to fall, it will not jeopardize your overall financial situation. Once your investment is complete, prioritize secure self-custody immediately. Transfer your assets to a hardware wallet that you control. Mental preparation for waiting and observing Prepare for the psychological challenges ahead. Please remember that the price may fall further after you buy. This does not mean your strategy has failed. The goal of such entries is never to capture the absolute bottom, because even professional traders rarely succeed in doing so. A more realistic objective is to achieve a better average cost over time. When you buy out of fear when others are selling, you are putting that goal into practice, regardless of how short-term prices fluctuate afterward. Accepting this mindset beforehand will help you minimize regret while maintaining a long-term perspective. 8. Conclusion and Long-Term Perspective Bitcoin is essentially a long-term store of value and a hedge against currency devaluation. Market sentiment fluctuations will not change the rules of the agreement. Traders’ panic will not eliminate its scarcity. Buying during times of extreme fear is a strategic move to acquire long-term assets at a discount, based on historical experience. This contrarian strategy requires remaining calm when everyone is panicking and acting decisively when everyone is holding back. But it is worth remembering that: This is merely a strategy, not a long-term guarantee; it is an opportunity, not a guarantee. Furthermore, the market constantly cycles between fear and greed, but for investors who maintain foresight and discipline, these cycles are precisely where the potential for profit lies.When the "Fear & Greed Index" remains in an unsettlingly low range for an extended period, the market is often shrouded in fear and uncertainty. With your portfolio in disarray and news headlines filled with doomsday prophecies, your instincts drive you to flee the market. But history records different stories. Those moments when panic reaches its peak and everyone surrenders can become opportunities for a few disciplined investors to create wealth. This article will focus on whether contrarian investment strategies are worth considering in the current market environment. 1. Market Sentiment Benchmark Market movements, especially in highly volatile markets like cryptocurrencies, are not solely driven by fundamentals and balance sheets. Participant psychology, namely the emotions of holders, buyers, or panic sellers, is equally important. "Market sentiment" essentially refers to the overall mindset of investors regarding a particular asset at any given moment. The Cryptocurrency Fear & Greed Index is a quantitative tool for measuring this elusive sentiment. The index integrates multiple data points, including price volatility, market momentum, social media activity, investor sentiment surveys, Bitcoin’s dominance over altcoins, and broader market trends. As is often the case, the greatest utility of this tool is often found in extreme indices. This index acts as a contrarian indicator, meaning that its signals are most valuable when market sentiment is highly convergent and reaches its extreme. Whether the emotional balance tilts extremely towards fear or greed, it may be a sign to investors: It's time to pay attention to the market. 2. Content measured by the index It should be clearly pointed out that the Fear & Greed Index measures current sentiment, not future prices. It is not a prediction of Bitcoin's price movement next week or next month. This index constructs a snapshot of the current market by aggregating data from multiple sources. With the help of sentiment analysis and data aggregation, it attempts to transform various market indicators into a single, readable value. Its function is to provide contextual references for decision-making, rather than to give simple buy or sell instructions. 3. Opportunity or trap? When the index is in the "extreme fear" zone (usually below 25), it signifies that market panic has reached its peak. Investors are now surrendering, and the sell-off seems endless. This also indicates that the market is oversold due to sentiment rather than fundamental factors, which may create real pricing failure opportunities for investors who dare to face their fears. That said, market sentiment could remain in the "fear" zone for weeks or even months. Prices can often fall to unexpectedly low levels. However, just as this index does not require investors to surrender immediately, it is also not a clear-cut buy signal. 4. What is a strategic opportunity? When the "extreme fear" index occurs simultaneously with certain other conditions, your buying logic will be significantly strengthened. Please pay attention to: A sharp price drop accompanied by high trading volume, or a slow, gradual decline, often reflects a continued deterioration in fundamentals, while a sudden plunge is more likely to stem from panic selling. Examining whether negative media coverage has reached its peak, obscuring rational analysis and amplifying emotional narratives. Is there widespread despair on social media? When platforms like X and Reddit are flooded with surrender posts, market sentiment may have bottomed out. Most importantly, analyze whether there are any obvious, entirely new, catastrophic fundamental factors. If no core protocol fails and no new survivability threats emerge, then the current fears may be out of touch with reality. In this regard, on-chain metrics can boost confidence at this moment. Looking at MVRV Z-Score or exchange net inflow data can help confirm that the divergence between sentiment and price is real. The focus should be on the divergence itself, namely the gap between market sentiment and the underlying reality. 5. Fear or rationality To reiterate, not every instance of extreme fear represents an opportunity. Sometimes, fear is indeed well-founded. Imagine a long and difficult bear market. There will be no dramatic surrender in the market; instead, prices will slowly erode, attention will fade, and fundamentals will quietly deteriorate. Or consider those black swan events whose systemic impact has not yet been eliminated. Fear is a reasonable reaction when major exchanges crash and risks are unclear, or when the protocol itself suffers a fundamental malfunction. The key difference here lies in the nature of the emotion itself. Panic selling driven by sentiment but with sound fundamentals presents a potential opportunity. Fear stemming from systemic problems leading to a genuine loss of confidence is a completely different matter. Being able to distinguish between these two scenarios is the essential difference between disciplined contrarian investing and blindly "catching a falling knife." 6. Investor Operation Strategies Knowing what to observe is important, but knowing how to act is even more crucial. Let's move from theory to practice and explore some specific methods to strengthen discipline and eliminate emotional interference in decision-making. Dollar-cost averaging For most investors facing a fearful market, dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is the preferred strategy. By automatically executing purchases periodically, you invest a fixed amount regardless of price levels, completely unaffected by emotions. In a bear market, you can systematically accumulate assets throughout the bottom range without needing to precisely predict the lowest point. During temporary pullbacks, you stick to your strategy and continue accumulating while others panic. Building warehouses in batches If you have a lump sum of money that you can invest at any time, rather than a regular cash flow, you may consider a phased investment strategy. Instead of investing all your funds at once, divide them into several portions (e.g., 3 to 5). Then, you can use specific fear and greed thresholds as trigger points. For example: When the index falls to 20, invest the first portion; when it falls to 15, invest the second portion; when it falls to 10, invest the third portion. The remaining portion is kept as a reserve for use if the market deteriorates further, or deployed as appropriate based on subsequent developments. This transforms the index from an abstract indicator into a concrete action trigger. It provides a systematic alternative to the all-or-nothing gambling behavior of "precise bottom-fishing." 7. Risk Management in Adversity Regardless of whether a bear market has truly arrived, any funds deployed during periods of extreme fear must be capital that you can withstand losses for several years. Bitcoin's high volatility means that your "extreme fear" buy-in position could fall another 30% before a recovery even begins. To manage this risk, there are several key principles to follow. Position management and portfolio discipline "Fear-driven buying" should still be placed within a pre-defined asset allocation framework. A reasonable approach is that, in any single purchase, the funds used for speculative accumulation should not exceed 5% to 10% of your total risk capital. This ensures that even if you time your judgment too early and prices continue to fall, it will not jeopardize your overall financial situation. Once your investment is complete, prioritize secure self-custody immediately. Transfer your assets to a hardware wallet that you control. Mental preparation for waiting and observing Prepare for the psychological challenges ahead. Please remember that the price may fall further after you buy. This does not mean your strategy has failed. The goal of such entries is never to capture the absolute bottom, because even professional traders rarely succeed in doing so. A more realistic objective is to achieve a better average cost over time. When you buy out of fear when others are selling, you are putting that goal into practice, regardless of how short-term prices fluctuate afterward. Accepting this mindset beforehand will help you minimize regret while maintaining a long-term perspective. 8. Conclusion and Long-Term Perspective Bitcoin is essentially a long-term store of value and a hedge against currency devaluation. Market sentiment fluctuations will not change the rules of the agreement. Traders’ panic will not eliminate its scarcity. Buying during times of extreme fear is a strategic move to acquire long-term assets at a discount, based on historical experience. This contrarian strategy requires remaining calm when everyone is panicking and acting decisively when everyone is holding back. But it is worth remembering that: This is merely a strategy, not a long-term guarantee; it is an opportunity, not a guarantee. Furthermore, the market constantly cycles between fear and greed, but for investors who maintain foresight and discipline, these cycles are precisely where the potential for profit lies.

Deconstructing the reverse logic behind the "fear index": the lower the value, the more you should buy?

2025/12/10 18:00

When the "Fear & Greed Index" remains in an unsettlingly low range for an extended period, the market is often shrouded in fear and uncertainty.

With your portfolio in disarray and news headlines filled with doomsday prophecies, your instincts drive you to flee the market.

But history records different stories.

This article will focus on whether contrarian investment strategies are worth considering in the current market environment.

1. Market Sentiment Benchmark

Market movements, especially in highly volatile markets like cryptocurrencies, are not solely driven by fundamentals and balance sheets.

Participant psychology, namely the emotions of holders, buyers, or panic sellers, is equally important.

"Market sentiment" essentially refers to the overall mindset of investors regarding a particular asset at any given moment. The Cryptocurrency Fear & Greed Index is a quantitative tool for measuring this elusive sentiment.

As is often the case, the greatest utility of this tool is often found in extreme indices.

This index acts as a contrarian indicator, meaning that its signals are most valuable when market sentiment is highly convergent and reaches its extreme.

Whether the emotional balance tilts extremely towards fear or greed, it may be a sign to investors:

It's time to pay attention to the market.

2. Content measured by the index

It should be clearly pointed out that the Fear & Greed Index measures current sentiment, not future prices.

It is not a prediction of Bitcoin's price movement next week or next month.

This index constructs a snapshot of the current market by aggregating data from multiple sources. With the help of sentiment analysis and data aggregation, it attempts to transform various market indicators into a single, readable value.

Its function is to provide contextual references for decision-making, rather than to give simple buy or sell instructions.

3. Opportunity or trap?

When the index is in the "extreme fear" zone (usually below 25), it signifies that market panic has reached its peak.

Investors are now surrendering, and the sell-off seems endless.

This also indicates that the market is oversold due to sentiment rather than fundamental factors, which may create real pricing failure opportunities for investors who dare to face their fears.

That said, market sentiment could remain in the "fear" zone for weeks or even months.

Prices can often fall to unexpectedly low levels.

However, just as this index does not require investors to surrender immediately, it is also not a clear-cut buy signal.

4. What is a strategic opportunity?

When the "extreme fear" index occurs simultaneously with certain other conditions, your buying logic will be significantly strengthened.

Please pay attention to:

  • A sharp price drop accompanied by high trading volume, or a slow, gradual decline, often reflects a continued deterioration in fundamentals, while a sudden plunge is more likely to stem from panic selling.
  • Examining whether negative media coverage has reached its peak, obscuring rational analysis and amplifying emotional narratives.
  • Is there widespread despair on social media? When platforms like X and Reddit are flooded with surrender posts, market sentiment may have bottomed out.

Most importantly, analyze whether there are any obvious, entirely new, catastrophic fundamental factors.

If no core protocol fails and no new survivability threats emerge, then the current fears may be out of touch with reality.

In this regard, on-chain metrics can boost confidence at this moment.

Looking at MVRV Z-Score or exchange net inflow data can help confirm that the divergence between sentiment and price is real.

The focus should be on the divergence itself, namely the gap between market sentiment and the underlying reality.

5. Fear or rationality

To reiterate, not every instance of extreme fear represents an opportunity. Sometimes, fear is indeed well-founded.

Imagine a long and difficult bear market.

Or consider those black swan events whose systemic impact has not yet been eliminated.

The key difference here lies in the nature of the emotion itself.

Panic selling driven by sentiment but with sound fundamentals presents a potential opportunity.

Fear stemming from systemic problems leading to a genuine loss of confidence is a completely different matter.

Being able to distinguish between these two scenarios is the essential difference between disciplined contrarian investing and blindly "catching a falling knife."

6. Investor Operation Strategies

Knowing what to observe is important, but knowing how to act is even more crucial.

Let's move from theory to practice and explore some specific methods to strengthen discipline and eliminate emotional interference in decision-making.

Dollar-cost averaging

For most investors facing a fearful market, dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is the preferred strategy.

By automatically executing purchases periodically, you invest a fixed amount regardless of price levels, completely unaffected by emotions.

In a bear market, you can systematically accumulate assets throughout the bottom range without needing to precisely predict the lowest point. During temporary pullbacks, you stick to your strategy and continue accumulating while others panic.

Building warehouses in batches

If you have a lump sum of money that you can invest at any time, rather than a regular cash flow, you may consider a phased investment strategy.

Instead of investing all your funds at once, divide them into several portions (e.g., 3 to 5). Then, you can use specific fear and greed thresholds as trigger points.

For example:

When the index falls to 20, invest the first portion; when it falls to 15, invest the second portion; when it falls to 10, invest the third portion. The remaining portion is kept as a reserve for use if the market deteriorates further, or deployed as appropriate based on subsequent developments.

This transforms the index from an abstract indicator into a concrete action trigger. It provides a systematic alternative to the all-or-nothing gambling behavior of "precise bottom-fishing."

7. Risk Management in Adversity

Regardless of whether a bear market has truly arrived, any funds deployed during periods of extreme fear must be capital that you can withstand losses for several years.

Bitcoin's high volatility means that your "extreme fear" buy-in position could fall another 30% before a recovery even begins. To manage this risk, there are several key principles to follow.

Position management and portfolio discipline

"Fear-driven buying" should still be placed within a pre-defined asset allocation framework.

A reasonable approach is that, in any single purchase, the funds used for speculative accumulation should not exceed 5% to 10% of your total risk capital.

This ensures that even if you time your judgment too early and prices continue to fall, it will not jeopardize your overall financial situation.

Once your investment is complete, prioritize secure self-custody immediately. Transfer your assets to a hardware wallet that you control.

Mental preparation for waiting and observing

Prepare for the psychological challenges ahead.

Please remember that the price may fall further after you buy. This does not mean your strategy has failed.

The goal of such entries is never to capture the absolute bottom, because even professional traders rarely succeed in doing so. A more realistic objective is to achieve a better average cost over time.

When you buy out of fear when others are selling, you are putting that goal into practice, regardless of how short-term prices fluctuate afterward.

Accepting this mindset beforehand will help you minimize regret while maintaining a long-term perspective.

8. Conclusion and Long-Term Perspective

Bitcoin is essentially a long-term store of value and a hedge against currency devaluation.

  • Market sentiment fluctuations will not change the rules of the agreement.
  • Traders’ panic will not eliminate its scarcity.

Buying during times of extreme fear is a strategic move to acquire long-term assets at a discount, based on historical experience. This contrarian strategy requires remaining calm when everyone is panicking and acting decisively when everyone is holding back.

But it is worth remembering that:

Furthermore, the market constantly cycles between fear and greed, but for investors who maintain foresight and discipline, these cycles are precisely where the potential for profit lies.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

The post Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday will conclude a two-day policymaking meeting and release a decision on whether to lower interest rates—following months of pressure and criticism from President Donald Trump—and potentially signal whether additional cuts are on the way. President Donald Trump has urged the central bank to “CUT INTEREST RATES, NOW, AND BIGGER” than they might plan to. Getty Images Key Facts The central bank is poised to cut interest rates by at least a quarter-point, down from the 4.25% to 4.5% range where they have been held since December to between 4% and 4.25%, as Wall Street has placed 100% odds of a rate cut, according to CME’s FedWatch, with higher odds (94%) on a quarter-point cut than a half-point (6%) reduction. Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both Trump appointees, voted in July for a quarter-point reduction to rates, and they may dissent again in favor of a large cut alongside Stephen Miran, Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers’ chair, who was sworn in at the meeting’s start on Tuesday. It’s unclear whether other policymakers, including Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, will favor larger cuts or opt for no reduction. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in his Jackson Hole, Wyoming, address last month the central bank would likely consider a looser monetary policy, noting the “shifting balance of risks” on the U.S. economy “may warrant adjusting our policy stance.” David Mericle, an economist for Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note the “key question” for the Fed’s meeting is whether policymakers signal “this is likely the first in a series of consecutive cuts” as the central bank is anticipated to “acknowledge the softening in the labor market,” though they may not “nod to an October cut.” Mericle said he…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:23
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00