France is famous for things like the Eiffel Tower and fashion, but now crypto kidnapping has also joined that list.  Following a persistent series of crypto-linkedFrance is famous for things like the Eiffel Tower and fashion, but now crypto kidnapping has also joined that list.  Following a persistent series of crypto-linked

France earns crypto kidnapping capital title as 2026 starts with violent streak

2026/02/17 07:00
4 min read

France is famous for things like the Eiffel Tower and fashion, but now crypto kidnapping has also joined that list. 

Following a persistent series of crypto-linked kidnappings, media outlets are now referring to France as the “global crypto kidnapping capital.” 

France, the cryptokidnapping capital of the world

France has been getting a bad rap lately, and 2026 has seen a continuation of that trend. It has just been named the leading hub for crypto-related kidnappings aka wrench attacks, a new form of crime that has been growing in frequency in recent times. 

Wrench attacks often involve getting physical or resorting to threats and abduction to compel victims to transfer their digital assets. According to a recent Gravitas special report by WION, there were up to 19 wrench attacks in France last year, the highest of any country globally. 

This year alone, the country has witnessed up to six different cases of wrench attacks, solidifying the nation’s position as the global epicenter of this new kind of crime, and the stories are gruesome. 

As Cryptopolitan reported earlier this month, Binance France CEO David Prinçay was the victim of a poorly executed house invasion in Val-de-Marne. Local police reports said that three masked men who were allegedly armed broke into a residential building early on February 12, around seven o’clock, in an attempt to find Binance’s local CEO.

Earlier this month, the partner of a 35-year-old magistrate in France received a picture of his partner accompanied by threats to mutilate her if they did not pay a ransom in cryptocurrency. 

The man’s wife had been targeted because he was an associate in a start-up with a cryptocurrency business. He reported the demand to French police, sparking a multi-agency manhunt involving as many as 160 officers. 

The magistrate and her elderly mother were in the custody of the kidnappers for 30 hours in a garage in southern France’s Drôme region until they received help from a neighbor who heard their commotion and helped them escape. 

No ransom was paid in this case, and the French authorities have reportedly arrested six suspects in connection with the case. It is one of the latest crypto-linked kidnappings to happen in France, which has been facing a wave of crypto-related wrench attacks and violent kidnappings targeting crypto natives. 

The driving force behind the violence 

Wrench attacks have been a problem for the crypto industry for years. However, the recent string of high-profile violent attacks over the past year has heightened the threat level for crypto investors, especially those located in France. 

Several factors are fueling this surge, with the most crucial one being data breaches. In June 2025, French media reported that an employee with the country’s tax agency had been steadily providing other alleged criminals with data on different crypto investors in the country.

To make matters worse, this January, it was revealed that Waltio, a service that lets investors calculate and report their crypto capital gains for tax reports, had been hacked. That attack allowed the attackers to gain access to 50,000 Waltio customers’ data, including email addresses and their 2024 tax reports.

Sensitive leaks are one thing, but another factor that makes crypto such an enticing sector for wrench attacks is that crypto makes a more convenient target to steal because digital assets are becoming more ubiquitous.

“As cryptocurrency adoption grows and more value is held directly by individuals, criminals are increasingly incentivised to bypass technical defenses altogether and target people instead,” TRM Labs’ Global Head of Policy, Ari Redbord, said.

The incidents have driven fear into the hearts of many crypto natives, forcing many to invest in physical security, especially during trips to France. 

A critical observation 

Globally, the frequency of wrench attacks has gone up by 75% year-on-year from 2024, with about 25 kidnappings, 3 murders over $40 million in losses. 

Europe accounts for nearly 40% of all these incidents, with France leading most countries by a wide margin. Many of the perpetrators who have been caught are young, often minors or young adults recruited via apps like Telegram and paid relatively small amounts to carry out the attacks. 

However, despite the arrests and severity of crimes, there have been no convictions, and experts believe this contributes to the lack of deterrence. As more wrench attacks are recorded, pressure is mounting on the French government to impose harsher penalties on convicted criminals and strengthen protections for its crypto population.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Market Opportunity
Bad Idea AI Logo
Bad Idea AI Price(BAD)
$0.00000000095
$0.00000000095$0.00000000095
0.00%
USD
Bad Idea AI (BAD) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49
Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

The post Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is trading around $68,700, down nearly 22% year to date
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:59